Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sources say Brady suspension coming next week


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Bro I don't know what rock you've been living under but Hardy got banned for 25 consecutive games (15 for us, 10 for DAL) and he got kicked off his team (us)

His suspension was 10 games from the perspective of the NFL. Which is the only perspective that counts in this discussion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just here to teach you the English language. Someone has to, since you butcher it all to hell and you didn't know that 2004 was more than a decade ago.

Hit me back when you are done arguing semantics(google that if you need to)

Carl Spackler murdered CarolinaCoolin in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No that's how you know how much I think of that person. He acts like a joke so I treat him like one. You can try to show me how I "lost" but I know you or him don't have anything.

What is really funny is that you actually thought his real name was Carl.

Sad...just damn sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This says what I have been thinking...

 

http://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/blog/2015/the-new-england-patriots-mysteriously-became-fumble-proof-in-2007

 

 

 

To really confirm something was dramatically different in New England, starting in 2007 thru present, I compared the 2000-06 time period (when Bill Belichick was their head coach and they won all of their Super Bowls) to the 2007-2014 time period.  The beauty of data is the results speak for themselves:
Obviously this information, when combined with the data above, is exceedingly compelling.  Not only can you visually see the change when aggregating the data into periods of 2000-06 and 2007-14, you can clearly see how it occurs on the following two graphs.  The data is the same, but details are added in the second graph to provide additional information and context:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To all the analysts who said "Caps in 5", thank you for telling us their departure time.
    • We won't know the answer to this for a long time. Reality is, Caleb has been the consensus #1 in that draft for years. Bryce was a similar situation, but mostly the same. He was not the clear and obvious #1 that Caleb was, but most teams had Bryce at QB1. The Panthers were always going to be terrible Bryce's rookie year.  I don't think DJ Moore's presence would have changed anything about that offense, as our guards, center, and left tackle were getting demolished on nearly every snap. It's clear Caleb's dad was trying to do everything possible to ensure Caleb didn't end up in Chicago with Eberflus. It's hard to imagine that he wouldn't have done the same, but probably more publicly with our situation, considering Carolina is an easier target for the media than Chicago. We can all speculate, but it's impossible to tell who is going to have the better career on May 16, 2025. If either QB doesn't pan out, we have an easy answer. If both flame out, the bears clearly won the trade, but it wouldn't have really mattered anyway. We all know how we win the trade. Candidly, even if one of the other picks we gave up ends up being a hall of fame player, we don't know if the panthers would have taken that player anyway. All you can do is make the best decision you can in the moment with the information you have. I really like Bryce Young, and I'm glad he's a Carolina Panther.  The only way to win in the modern NFL is to have an absolute dude at QB. I personally am happy that our franchise recognizes this, as I remember times when they did not. 
×
×
  • Create New...