Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What do we do now with Nate Chandler?


Recommended Posts

most will probably say we should cut him, and understandably so. however, I'm wondering if he doesn't still have a place on the team. what if we moved him back to guard? didn't he start on the defensive line as a DT?

don't get me wrong, I dont think he should ever be asked to play OT ever again. but I'm curious whether he could benefit this team in another position.

what say you Huddle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly the kid should be proud he has lasted this long in the NFL as an undrafted DT turned OG/OT. He will have to compete for a job in camp like every other guy, He has flexibility, but he lacks quality play at the positions he has been assimilated into. He has to make a big jump to make the 53.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's gotta be on the outside looking in right now in terms of getting a roster spot. Right now, we don't need to do anything with him. Bring him to camp and let him compete.

I'm of a similar mindset. I think he is just camp fodder at this point. but I also think that, used correctly, he has a chance to benefit the team. I'm with you. let him compete at multiple positions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you mean you what do we do?

 

Have you seen our pathetic OL? Even with the addition of our elite back up OT just drafted? We're still pitiful along the OL. So we keep Chandler, because we don't have anyone better, as sad and unfortunate that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...