Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Home Theater Projector


walt227

Recommended Posts

I just bought a new house a couple months ago and it has an upstairs theater room that's approximately 13x21. I have a flat-screen in there now, but would like to install a projector. I am clueless as to what to get and have no desire to spend an outrageous amount of money on making this happen. So...what do I need?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets start with the video side of things...A projector and screen -You need to know what size screen to make an accurate decision on the right projector. Are you leavin the flatscreen for everyday viewing? Then you will want a drop-down/motorized screen. Moving the LCD/plasma and dedicating the room to "a theater"? Go with a fixed, although I would prol'ly keep the flatscreen and go with the more expensive motorized. Gotta go, I will finish answering in a bit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you want? Projector with fixed screeen? A screen that rolls up and down? Surround sound?

Let me know what you would like to see. That is actually what I do for a living.

I can recommend projectors, screens and how to wire the room if you need it.

I'm not sure what i want to be honest! lol. I'm a total noob with this. My neighbor donated an old projector for garage football and I got to thinking about how cool it would be to hook up my theater room. The room is off a gameroom, so the only purpose is to watch TV/Movies. What would you recommend? I' m not opposed to a fixed screen if that is advantageous. Of course, a motorized screen is pimp and all...:D

I have surround sound already (minus me being too lazy to hook up the rear speakers).

I'm decent at running wires, but any suggstions would be appreciated!

Thanks, South Cak!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets start with the video side of things...A projector and screen -You need to know what size screen to make an accurate decision on the right projector. Are you leavin the flatscreen for everyday viewing? Then you will want a drop-down/motorized screen. Moving the LCD/plasma and dedicating the room to "a theater"? Go with a fixed, although I would prol'ly keep the flatscreen and go with the more expensive motorized. Gotta go, I will finish answering in a bit...

LCD can go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like between southcakalac and me, you have all the info that you need. This is what I do also. How much are you trying to spend? or, rather, what is your budget? What is important to you? Video quality? Big picture? Saving money?

Check this out for cost effective equipment...

To be honest I have not set a budget because I'm clueless as to what I need---I know that sounds stupid...sorry. In order: Money, picture quality, size. I would like to stay around 1k for hardware if that's reasonable. I generally do my homework on things like this and end up buying XYZ because it's the most sensible choice all the way around---does that make sense?

Thank you guys for all your help!!!

The bottom of the wall is 12'3 and the top of the wall is 5'2. Here's a crappy cell phone pic standing in the middle of the room.

MediaRoom.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'd stick with the biggest flat screen I could afford. IMO, a projected picture is never going to be a good as a direct view tv. Just isn't. Now, if you're the type who thinks the picture at a movie theater is better than what you can get at home, you'd probably be better off with a projector.

To me, the lure of the movie theater is the size of the picture and the volume of the sound.....if theaters projected on a 60 or 70" screen, no one would show up.

If you're wow'd by a soft picture because it's 200" and covers you entire wall then I guess projector is the way to go. Me, I'm happy with 60" of nice sharp picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'd stick with the biggest flat screen I could afford. IMO, a projected picture is never going to be a good as a direct view tv. Just isn't. Now, if you're the type who thinks the picture at a movie theater is better than what you can get at home, you'd probably be better off with a projector.

To me, the lure of the movie theater is the size of the picture and the volume of the sound.....if theaters projected on a 60 or 70" screen, no one would show up.

If you're wow'd by a soft picture because it's 200" and covers you entire wall then I guess projector is the way to go. Me, I'm happy with 60" of nice sharp picture.

Point taken, but I have a room truly meant for a projector. I can have 100" 1080p projector turnkey for $1300 or so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

shinner has a point, you still need the screen after you pay what ever for the projector. Same site, but what do you think about this? or a step up from the last? Or, this just hit the market, 82"DLP...

I am a big fan of DLP, I own a 52" Mits. I think its a better picture than any LCD or plasma, and you get more picture for less money.

If you decided a projector is what you want, and you are tryin to save a few bucks, try this for the screen. We use it in our office, just havent ever put it in somebody's house...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't like a soft picture...all I'm saying. There's no way in hell that any movie in any theater (including the famed IMAX) looks better than when it's released on Bluray and shown on pretty much any of the HDTV technologies available. I know there are people who will argue that from now until the end of time because they prefer the "theater look", but to me, personally, I prefer a sharper picture with better contrast.

(Oh, and I thought a lot about putting a projector in my house before settling on the plasma.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respectfully, I disagree Shinner. I've seen some real good home theatre set ups before using projectors, and I think, when you get a good screen, a decent projector (even at 720p), and a good 5.1 system, you can really bring the theatre home with a razor sharp picture.

As with most systems whether or not you actually bother to set and calibrate your display and audio will determine how good it actually is. I compare my friends TV to mine. I have an almost 3 year old JVC 720p LCoS RPTV that I've actually attempted some level of callibration (sorry, not worth a $200 trip from an ISF professional). He has a pretty new 52" 1080p Samsung LCD, which itself is a great TV. I think his is still set to torch mode (out of the box). Because I've tried to set mine up, it has as natural a look as I can get it. His people look like lobsters, but the green grass is amazingly green (not the best...but what he likes I guess). I still wow friends with HD and blu ray material on my TV =) So again, it comes down to how much you want to tinker with your system.

But a note for projector shopping, please go with a reputable dealer. Get someone who will actually help you plan out your set up. Most of these retailers will just try to sell you whatever they are told to sell you without any real knowledge of what its going to take to set up properly. There are a couple of good resources here. Good luck in making your decision, whether its a fixed display or a projector system.

PS. Don't skimp on some crappy HTiB when you are setting up your theatre. there area ton of good $1k 5.1 systems out there which will make you smile for years and years. Recievers are getting cheaper with all the features you need as well as good power supplies to keep those speakers happy! Sorry, nothing makes me madder seeing someone drop $3k on a Bose system when you could spend half that and get something that sounds SO MUCH BETTER. =)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respectfully, I disagree Shinner. I've seen some real good home theatre set ups before using projectors, and I think, when you get a good screen, a decent projector (even at 720p), and a good 5.1 system, you can really bring the theatre home with a razor sharp picture.

Dave...I've yet to see a razor sharp picture in a theater :)

But a lot of people like it that way....they want the look of film. To each his own....I just know the picture I get on my TV at home watching movies I've seen in the theater is always better. I'd love to see the home projectors who's pic can match a plasma or lcd.

Honestly....cause if I saw it with my own eyes, I'd surely be thinking about future plans! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had 3 DLP projectors, love it. Use to have the Infocus 4805 then the IN72 model that replaced it. Now I have a Sharp DT-510 pj thrown to a 100" screen I built. Picture is great, though I'm waiting for 1080p pj's to get under $1k, although I can't imagine picture being much better, espeically with blu-ray.

Great for Panther games also. buy the parts online and you can build a HT like this pretty cheap. I have a Polk In-wall 5.1 sound setup. If room wasnt pre-wired I would've tried one of the good Sound Bar options.

have a 50" plasma in the living room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looks like Troy Hill was ready to hold his team accountable and a certain DC thought it would make the defense worse. I'm sure Troy Hill was the problem with the defense. Watch him go back to Brandon Staley with the 49ers now.
    • Some here have it wrong when based on hard numbers that determine a game. Here's a lengthy and deep analysis. Don't continue reading if you are not willing to look at the good and bad of your favorite players. The pass blocking was horrendous in the first half, and Dalton still kept the game competitive. Dalton was obviously directed to throw it to Thomas. Thomas ran his route horribly and didn't come back to the ball. The DB had an easy path to just race in front of Thomas. He's a TE who should be using his body to keep a DB from doing that. Lazy play by Thomas. The throw was good and it was the correct read (delivered 15 yards downfield with 3 to 5 yards to the sideline is where that ball was placed for Thomas). Here's how the drives went for the Falcons game. Drive 1: Ekwonu killed it. Drive 2: Heavy Dalton passing (Johnson & Moore). TD Drive 3: Dalton short passing (J.Sanders & XL). Punt Drive 4: Heavy Hubbard touches. FG Drive 5: Hubbard/M.Sanders touches. Punt (Running game failed and forced Dalton into 2 long passing downs. Got a PI to keep drive alive on one.) Drive 6: Heavy Dalton passing (5 targeted receivers). TD Drive 7: Running & short passing game to open the 2nd half. FG (Hubbard, Mingo, M.Sanders, J.Sanders, Thomas) OL ended the drive with a 2nd and 19. This is the ONLY drive the Panthers had for 3Q. Defensive failure Drive 8: Heavy Hubbard touches with TE targets. INT (Ian Thomas gave up INT with a lazy route and zero awareness of using his body to keep the DB from easily crossing his body. The play was called for Thomas and the play worked perfectly with him cutting through the zone to a wide open pocket. All Thomas had to do was get his body in between the trailing defender and the ball while staying on a line to the sideline. Thomas rounded his break and drifted to 18 yards deep at the end of his route. Gave the advantage to the speed of the trail defender. Pass was on point for a 15 yard crossing route. Play call was good. Receiver execution of a dig route was awful). The defense and Thomas in the 2nd half ended the game. Scoring % is 50% after this INT. That's still good for an offense. [Down 15 points with 5 minutes left. Running game has produced 6 points in 5 of 8 drives lasting 3 to 5 minutes per drive. Dalton has been successful on 2 of the 3 drives he was called on with the 1 failed drive stopped with bad pass blocking and relying on a TE.] Drive 9: All pass with defense protecting a lead. OL pass blocking fails again putting Dalton into a 2nd and 20. Dalton gets it to a 4th & 4 and throws incomplete with Ekwonu (one on one) thrown into him in 2 seconds forcing a high throw. (Canales, Dalton and Johnson were on point for a likely 1st down. Ekwonu pass blocking failed.) Turnover on downs. Drive 10: 2 minutes to go down 18 points. All pass. INT (Dalton didn't anticipate the CB jumping the route after reading a deep zone) The defense only stopped 2 drives from scoring. The OL lacks discipline and is a liability with their pass blocking. No one can excuse Ekwonu for what he does in pass blocking. It continues to cost the Panthers late in games, and on critical 4th down pass plays. The OL is very good at run blocking, but the RBs are not as good as fans want to believe. They are not playmakers to open up a game with a strong run blocking OL. The RBs are only good enough for controlling clock with a lead (and that needs to be more consistent). Too many missed opportunities from the RBs behind this OL. The TEs and Mingo are liabilities in the passing game. Their mistakes plus the lack of discipline on the OL is leading to way too many 3rd & longs. 7 of 12 3rd downs were long. 4 of the 7 were 3rd & 10+. The most efficient part of the team against the Falcons was Dalton, Johnson, Coker and Canales' play calling. XL is close to being in this group. Negative plays that resulted in 3rd & longs, failed 4th downs, INTs, and fumbles lost : Hubbard 3; Ekwonu 4; Thomas 2; J.Sanders 1; M.Sanders 1; Lewis 1; Nijman 1; Dalton 1. 1st downs/TDs converted: Rushing: Hubbard 6; M.Sanders 1; Dalton 1. Passing: Dalton 13 (Johnson 6; M.Sanders 1; Coker 2; J.Sanders 1; Legette 2; Hubbard 1). Top 3 liabilities: 1. Ekwonu 2. Hubbard 3. Thomas. Top 3 strengths: 1. Dalton 2. Hubbard 3. Johnson Anyone with a 1 doesn’t make a list. The goal is to have ZERO players on the liability list and 3 or more players on the strengths list. Then you want the opposite for the opponent to gauge the defense. Only 1 player of the Falcons made the liability list (Algiers with back to back runs for 0 yards on the 10th drive (final) of the game). Not a single Falcons OL with more than 1 critical mistake. Falcons only had 2 legit 3rd and longs all game (4 if you add the final plays of the game for them with the kneel downs). The Falcons converted 25 times in 9 drives. That makes them look better than the 5-0 Chiefs offense. Panthers' conversions by week: 1. 11; 2. 7; 3. 24; 4. 24; 5. 14; 6. 21. Dalton has been the key factor in the offense consistently converting 20+. The Bears game was planned around Hubbard carrying it to keep the Panthers defense off the field, and that failed. That is the only game Dalton has started that there hasn't been a single drive over 4 minutes in the 1st half (Dalton targeted 2 WRs on 2 passes until the 2 minute warning against the Bears). Realize the pass blocking OL and their discipline is a liability. The RBs lack of consistency is a liability. The TEs are a huge problem. The Panthers need a 3rd down back desperately, and Mingo should be converted to that role for now. The run blocking OL is carrying average RBs. Dalton is good enough to win and has done well playing through poor pass blocking. The receivers outside of Mingo are executing well. Canales is getting receivers open and calling plays to beat the defense. That's the state of the offense. Good enough to win, but not on at a level to put up 40 points per game. The offense has to worry about keeping up with their defense rather than simply executing to be good and win games at the end. List Dalton's critical mistakes that have ended a drive. Ekwonu, Mingo & Thomas are responsible for 3 of his 4 interceptions. His 3rd or 4th and short passes have failed how many times without being impacted by a terrible block or dropped pass?  45 drives to look at. I've already told you 3 that are not on Dalton. 10 resulted in TDs & 3 were end of game/half. That leaves 29 drives. Go see how they ended, and who's responsible. I already know, and I don't think some of you are willing to acknowledge who the drive killers are on the offense. It's not Dalton leading the way. Tough truths.
    • Haven't had time to pay attention to college ball the last couple weeks but seems like all the mock drafts have Sanders, Hunter, and Ward in the top 5 and then kinda mixed bag after that. I like that Ward is a playmaker with a little Favre style in him, seems real comfortable leading the huddle. Very different vibe from the soft stuff we've dealt with the last couple years. I believe he would no doubt beat out BY in a camp battle for what it's worth
×
×
  • Create New...