Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cornerback in the first?


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

After today's press conference I am starting to think cornerback or safety might be more more likely than some have thought in the past.

Let's look at some our needs and why they might not be there.

Tackle: I don't think we spend a 1st round pick on a player that we feel like is most likely a right tackle. Also I don't think we spend a first round draft pick on a player that might take a few years to develop into a LT. This might only leave 2-3 potential players and there is a chance they go early.

Running Back: For us to spend a first round pick on a running back he is going to have to be an exceptional talent. A three down back who can pass protect and catch. In my opinion Gurly is the only one who fits this description. Good chance he is gone by the time we draft.

Receiver: DG made the comment today that this years group of receivers might have more depth to it then last year. There is a chance our front office thinks they can find a productive player in rounds 3-4. The ECU fans might be happy.

Edge rushers: A lot of the edge rushers this year seem to be 3-4 type of guys.

After these 4 groups secondary seems to be the most logical need for our team.

Jeremy has talked extensively about Landon Collins being a possibility at safety for us at 25 but how would people feel about a CB in the first round.

I could see players such as Kevin Johnson, Ronald Darby, or Byron Jones being in play at 25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually all for this. I want a LT but I hate this years class besides Peat. I want a DE but I'm not feeling one in the first round. I want WR but I think we can get a good one in rounds 2 or 3 and not pay a premium price for a comparable talent.

That said, a CB or S is probably what I want to see happen the most. Tillman can play the other position we don't draft and allow us to move Bene to the nickle. Our secondary would be nasty. I would be very happy with this situation playing out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Soooo many bad turnovers again. Luckily Martin played well.  
    • Yes. Cade 100% tripped and pitched it to Mafah.  That’s not in dispute.  We agree on that.  Mafah got the ball, fell to the ground and then attempted to complete the rest of the play….which was the lateral to the WR on the end around.  You are calling the lateral from Mafah to the end around WR the ball popping up.   It was whistled dead.   Then they ran another play.  the review then awarded the ball to SC after we ran another play for what happened after a play was whistled dead.   How does that part work lol?  How do you recover a ball if a play was whistled dead for a downed player prior to a recovery?  I think the refs screwed Clemson twice.   That’s not why they lost.  Please don’t think that is my argument.   They lost because Cade chocked and panicked at the end.  They lost because Sellers should have been put on the ground for a loss countless times and they didn’t.  They lost because our over loyal Dabo wouldn’t bench his favorite hurt RB.    Clemson lost for lots of reasons. SC deserved to win.  Those calls were bad though IMO.  They exist in every game. 
    • I can’t recall an NBA team with this many injuries.  It’s getting absurd at this point
×
×
  • Create New...