Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What do you think ...Mariotta to Phildelphia


Recommended Posts

They've got big holes on D and soon the o-line so I'd be fine with them trading a bunch of picks for a QB who would be a bust anywhere but Kelly's system. Look how well Foles played in his system... Chip could have any decent QB there playing effectively so it seems pointless to trade up for Mariota. Wouldn't scare me as much as Winston going to the Bucs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the draft hasn't occurred it wouldn't take too much common sense to realize what was implied.

Then again... Next time I will remember I am dealing with the huddle.

Huddlers are like Pavlov's dogs. You have to remember that the meat of the free agency period wasn't that long ago. Plus, like you intimated, it's never been the sharpest bunch. :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • https://www.devex.com/people/como-llamar-a-united-airlines-desde-republica-dominicana-2139577 https://www.devex.com/people/como-llamar-a-united-airlines-desde-republica-dominicana-2139577   https://www.devex.com/people/como-llamar-a-united-airlines-desde-republica-dominicana-2139577 https://www.devex.com/people/como-llamar-a-united-airlines-desde-republica-dominicana-2139577 https://www.devex.com/people/como-llamar-a-united-airlines-desde-republica-dominicana-2139577
    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
×
×
  • Create New...