Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Running Back Class


jdpanther5

Recommended Posts

Stumbled across an article by Bob McGinn in which he documents a poll he took of 20 personnel men about this year's RB class. The top two are predictable, but it's kind of a crapshoot beyond that.

http://m.jsonline.com/sports/packers/todd-gurley-leads-ball-carriers-but-several-in-big-ten-among-top-10-b99486141z1-301335331.html

The whole article is worth a read, but here are the rankings:

1. Todd Gurley (93 points, 13 firsts)

2. Melvin Gordon (86 points, 7 firsts)

3. Ameer Abdullah (32)

4. T.J. Yeldon (31)

5. Tevin Coleman (21)

6. Duke Johnson (15)

7. Jay Ajayi (13)

8. Buck Allen (5)

9. David Johnson (2)

T10. David Cobb, Jeremy Langford (1)

Kinda surprised Abdullah is that high. I won't dispute him being maybe the third most talented back, but he's undersized and thus may not be an every-down guy. I don't see Yeldon over Coleman either, the latter of which is my third RB.

Ajayi would also be in the mix as the third back, but his injury seems to have scared teams off. Lots of other talented guys like Mike Davis, John Crockett, and Cameron Artis-Payne among others, didn't get a mention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting this.  Interesting. 

 

Big drop-off after #2. 

 

I really liked Davis at SC, so I would have no trouble going with him in the 4th round or so.  We have looked at a few of the later-round backs too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't surprise me one bit if either Tevin Coleman or Duke Johnson end up being the best RB out of the class.  Gurley is the most talented, but can he stay healthy.  Gordon is a near lock to be a bust IMO.  Abdullah has that fumblitis which sucks, because other than that I think he's very similar to Gio Bernard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting this. Interesting.

Big drop-off after #2.

I really liked Davis at SC, so I would have no trouble going with him in the 4th round or so. We have looked at a few of the later-round backs too.

I love Davis too but I could never figure him out in college. When he's healthy and trying, he's elite but some games he appeared to be taking it easy and not trying. If a team gets him late and he gives 100% effort in the pros, someone got a steal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something to consider is that If they're set with Fozzy being a change of pace/scat type, Stewart as the big component, and Todman as depth/KR, getting another bigger but all-around back would be ideal.  

 

Langford, Buck Allen, David Johnson, Taz Crockett, and Yeldon all kind of fit the mold I'm thinking would be the best fit outside of Gurley, Gordon, Ajaye, and Coleman.  Big but fast enough to bust open long runs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Davis too but I could never figure him out in college. When he's healthy and trying, he's elite but some games he appeared to be taking it easy and not trying. If a team gets him late and he gives 100% effort in the pros, someone got a steal.

 

Nobody had a closer seat to "Marcus Lattimer Story" than Davis.  He even referenced Lattimer when deciding to come out.  I wonder if possible injury was in his head.

 

I can't say it would not be in mine.  I have a chance for a deal of about $2m over 4 years at worst, and then lose it all vs. Central Florida?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, let me get this out there. Langford in the 4th. We still get to use our top 3 picks on WR, OL, and CB. Yet we still get a big back with enough speed to get to the house. He can pick up the blitz, and catches the ball very well. He has great vision, and has surprising wiggle to make folks miss. He also has a great spin move, which he can use in space, or in a crowd.

He isn't a scat back, but we have Fozzy for that. Langford is just what the doctor ordered. He can do everything we want our back-up RB to be able to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They reached for Pickett, so they are not immune to it.  I could see that as well.  I just think the Colts are flying under the radar and they have been too quiet concerning their QB situation--of course, they could think Jones is their guy (they had a good one named Jones a long time ago) but I think they are done with the Richardson experiment.   Even if I believed in Jones, I would still draft a QB--I also read one mock that said the Jets would take Sanders if he falls to 7---I disagree, but I was once wrong and it still bothers me.
    • I just switched to prime video with fanduel south. Will I be able to watch the Canes playoff games still?
    • I mean, you can use that "logic," but the problem is that most practice squad players, backups or average guys don't put the play on film that Wharton did when given their opportunities.  Perhaps you'll end up right, but I don't think that just because a guy has been in a rotation makes him inherently less productive because he gets more snaps. I will say that the KC fans I've seen on social media loved him, and considered him their second best DT,  regardless of his "rotational" status, and generally considered him a dawg, so I'm going to give him the benefit of doubt until he shows otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...