Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seahawks GM hints he'll just let Wilson walk if he doesn't lower his demanded price.


Recommended Posts

It's not ~30 "imaginary plays".  It's called extrapolation.  You won't know what that means, so let me help you with that:

 

In mathematics, extrapolation is the process of estimating, beyond the original observation range, the value of a variable on the basis of its relationship with another variable.

 

Sorry, obviously statistics are over your head.  My bad.  I'll try to remember that in the future.

 

Doesn't mean poo in football when you have a lot more variables in the way, like say, Quarterbacks ability which is what this topic is all about. I already addressed that with the projected fantasy football stats example in the same post, so I would suggest you focus more on reading comprehension to go along with that community college education that you're proudly flaunting tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Olsen is pretty much the same (or slightly better) TE he was with Cutler. I don't remember who the hell the bears trotted out as QB in his first two years.

 

Demonstrably false.  He is MUCH better with Cam.

 

In two seasons with Cutler:

101 catches on 178 targets for a 56.7% catch percentage with a 10.05ypc average and averaging 508 yards per season on 89 targets per season.

 

In four seasons with Cam:

271 catches on 425 targets for a 63.7% catch percentage with a 11.85ypc average and averaging 802 yards per season on 106 targets per season.  If you drop the first season where his catch percentage was much lower than the last three at 50%, you get a catch percentage of 67.4%

 

 

So, let's do the extrapolation for Cutler...

 

Based on the averages, if Olsen averaged those 106 targets per season with Cutler, he'd average:

60 catches for 603 yards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't mean poo in football when you have a lot more variables in the way, like say, Quarterbacks ability which is what this topic is all about. I already addressed that with the projected fantasy football stats example in the same post, so I would suggest you focus more on reading comprehension to go along with that community college education that you're proudly flaunting tonight.

 

I'm sorry you're mad.  It's okay to just say that you were wrong.  It happens to everyone.

 

Yes, I'm aware there are more variables at play, but we can simply go off of the information we have available.  Strangely, you want to act like the only variables at play in LaFell's production in Carolina vs. NE are Cam vs. Brady.

 

Would you like me to show you my MBA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right about Lafell in Cams first year. However he had a much reduced role back then, starting only 6 games. Teams had to focus on Olsen/Shockey duo and Smith before Lafell. The 2013 Panthers and 2014 pats had a #1 TE (Olsen/Gronk), number 1 receiver (Smith/Edelmen) and Lafell was the 2. Much similar situation for Lafell which grants a better comparison.

Olsen is pretty much the same (or slightly better) TE he was with Cutler. I don't remember who the hell the bears trotted out as QB in his first two years.

 

Smith? Clausen, enough said.

 

Ginn? Was never a factor in the 49ers offense.

 

Cam did a good job resurrecting the Panthers offense for a year... but Panthers O has been below average to terribad ever since. Not all his fault though.

 

Yes, I am aware of all those factors. However, just a few posts ago, you were in favor of only using LaFell's bulk stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only on the huddle is Wilson a game manager that doesn't deserve a big contract. People around here sure devalue QBs.

If Seattle doesn't pay Wilson, some other teams sure as hell will, put Wilson on the jets, bills or Texans and they all becomes playoff teams if not superbowl contenders.

And the same would happen with Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Demonstrably false.  He is MUCH better with Cam.

 

In two seasons with Cutler:

101 catches on 178 targets for a 56.7% catch percentage with a 10.05ypc average and averaging 508 yards per season on 89 targets per season.

 

In four seasons with Cam:

271 catches on 425 targets for a 63.7% catch percentage with a 11.85ypc average and averaging 802 yards per season on 106 targets per season.  If you drop the first season where his catch percentage was much lower than the last three at 50%, you get a catch percentage of 67.4%

 

 

So, let's do the extrapolation for Cutler...

 

Based on the averages, if Olsen averaged those 106 targets per season with Cutler, he'd average:

60 catches for 603 yards. 

 

yeah i'll admit im wrong there. i just glossed over his stats with the bears on NFL.com and they seemed pretty good. cams better than quitler so no surprise there.

 

i still stand by what i said with lafell being an overall improved player with brady, but he's a poo player in the grand scheme of things, so whatever. not worth having a shitstorm over. have a good night

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's about time there's another huddle Wilson jelly thread!!!

 

I love the comments about how Wilson has better numbers because he has so many more weapons than your #1 pick...fug those make me laugh!!!

 

those incredible receivers like Jermaine Kearse and Riccardo Lockette...annual pro bowlers for sure!!!

 

No receivers...all their eggs in the run game basket and yet he's 4-0 against you in his young career...but only three of those were in your stadium!!!

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's about time there's another huddle Wilson jelly thread!!!

 

I love the comments about how Wilson has better numbers because he has so many more weapons than your #1 pick...fug those make me laugh!!!

 

those incredible receivers like Jermaine Kearse and Riccardo Lockette...annual pro bowlers for sure!!!

 

No receivers...all their eggs in the run game basket and yet he's 4-0 against you in his young career...but only three of those were in your stadium!!!

 

Riiiight... it was that powerful Russell Wilson offense that exploded for scores of 16, 12, and 13 points that did us in. Not the rest of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see why people don't get that Wilson has not proven anything yet. Kaepernick also came unto a team with stacked talent and took them to two straight NFCCG and a superbowl. Well what happened last season when they tried to rely more on his passing game? You guessed right.

 

The GM and coach know the value of Wilson in their offense. He does make some amazing game saving throws but guess what, those happen once or twice a game. Other QBs with bad defenses have to consistently make those plays. We can claim run first team all we want but if he was any good, they would not have had to significantly raise Lynch's salary to have him back.

 

WRT Cam, I think he may be coming into his own. The no huddle stuff to me is what makes most of these great QBs. Rodgers for example. Almost always in no huddle and reacting rather than reading too much. I think our coaches noticed it and Ron said they may want to do more of that next season. I think Cam will do very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only on the huddle is Wilson a game manager that doesn't deserve a big contract. People around here sure devalue QBs.

If Seattle doesn't pay Wilson, some other teams sure as hell will, put Wilson on the jets, bills or Texans and they all becomes playoff teams if not superbowl contenders.

And the same would happen with Cam.

 

i'm sure if you took a nationwide poll, it would not be "only on the huddle"

 

wilson is known as a game manager by pretty much everyone who isn't a seahawks fan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's about time there's another huddle Wilson jelly thread!!!

 

I love the comments about how Wilson has better numbers because he has so many more weapons than your #1 pick...fug those make me laugh!!!

 

those incredible receivers like Jermaine Kearse and Riccardo Lockette...annual pro bowlers for sure!!!

 

No receivers...all their eggs in the run game basket and yet he's 4-0 against you in his young career...but only three of those were in your stadium!!!

 

We complained about his receivers also until Tate went to DET. Wilson is a poor pocket QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No he's not. He fits perfectly into what they do and unless they can find someone who can take care of the ball like he does, they may not win as many games.

 

RW in against GB in the NFCCG is what most other QB face weekly in the NFL. He threw four picks when they tried to lean on his arm, it is no surprise that he has one of the least passing attempts among the young QBs.

 

I mean SEA consistently wins games when he passes for under 150yds! How many QB in the NFL have that luxury?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of this is new information that is recycled old information added to some inferences based on tweets and a reaction to tweets that involve the #2, #3, and #9 picks.  Since there are not many new topics on this board, I thought I would start a thread that considers all reasonable possibilities.  I think this is a pre-draft soap opera that is worthy of popcorn. 1.  First, it began before the college season had ended, when Prime announced that Shedeur Sanders ($$ from now on) should not be drafted by some organizations, basically throwing an Eli/Archie Manning threat out to the world.  Then after free agency, he changed his tune, probably when he realized Cam Ward was going #1 and the Browns and Giants liked the two best players in the draft--Carter and Hunter.  The Raiders signed Geno, the Jets signed Fields, the Saints re-signed Carr to silly money, and suddenly, the only team without a QB was Pittsburgh--and we all know that is where Rodgers is going to end up unless he decides to spelunk his way into retirement. The Rams are another team that might want Sanders, but they do not pick until the end of the draft.  So it seems that the Saints is the only real opportunity to start if you ignore Cleveland (just signed Flacco) and the Giants (who have Russell and Winston now).  It is almost like a game of musical chairs, and it seems telling the Browns to FO may have been a mistake.  2. $$ has a mediocre pro day.  Some were not impacted; some were underwhelmed. Meanwhile, analysts are moving $$ down their boards, out of the top five, then some moved $$ out of the top 10.  It started to look as though Pittsburgh would take him at #21, and possibly the Rams at #26.  3.  Then a miracle happened, sorta.  Derek Carr announced that he is considering shoulder surgery that would/could impact the 2025 season rather profoundly.  Louis Riddick, a close friend of the Sanders family, tweeted the news that the #9 pick just got interesting.  Prime responded with an eyeballs emoji.  4.  Meanwhile, Prime seems to be in "shut up" mode about it, fearing that his involvement is probably not helping--and it was not.   That same close friend, Louis Riddick, said the following on ESPN two days prior to the Carr news breaking.  It is safe to assume that he is speaking on behalf of Prime.   Note that the screen indicates that Kiper was already projecting $$ to the Saints:  5.  It is also noteworthy that the Raiders also brought in $$ for a visit, along with Graham and a few others. However, I think Jeanty is already in silver and black---just due diligence.  Meanwhile, Pittsburgh is sitting there waiting for flower-child Rodgers to emerge from his cave of tranquility to let them know what his spirit animal has told him about playing football in 2025. 6.  And then there is the minor (probably) issue of Milroe being invited to the Green Room.  NFL Network reports that they have actually decreased the number of invites because players sitting in the Green Room is a negative distraction to what they promote as a celebratory event.  So the fact that he got an invitation suggests that there is some first round interest in him because they ask GMs who they should invite (confidentially, of course).  7.  Prime seems to be using this opportunity to keep his Colorado Buffalo program in the spotlight--and it is smart, especially with today's transfer portal.  Has this hurt $$? 8.  After showing no interest in Sanders at the combine (did not meet with him), the Steelers suddenly bring him in for a visit.  The city of Pittsburgh becomes electric.  (This, of course, before the Carr news broke).  Tired of waiting on Moondust Rodgers and frustrated with the Watt situation, Pittsburgh is not forgetting about the Jaxxon Dart rumors and focusing on Sanders.  In fact, one local writer in the Steel City predicted a blockbuster trade, now that Omar Kahn is the new GM:  9.  While some podcast crack and crystal meth users in New Orleans are suggesting that the Saints' solution to this issue is to sign Rodgers (referencing their WRs and suggesting that they draft an OL) on a one-year deal, giving Carr a chance to recover and waiting for the 2026 NFL draft.  Good plan, except your cap situation is rivaled only by the National Debt.  10.  And let's not forget the Rams.  I am sure they would like to bring in their QB of the future for a year to play behind Stafford--and for him at times--so they too are in play.  However, I wonder if they are the team that wants to see if they can develop Milroe.  It just sounds Ramsy. COMMENTARY: I do not think the Steelers are going to trade the top edge rusher in football and a first and second so they can move from 21 to 5 to overdraft an above average QB.  I think they are more likely, however, to trade with the Panthers, sitting right before New Orleans.  New Orleans, on the other hand, could trade up if they think the Steelers or Rams might try to trade with Carolina. If Sanders gets past the Jets, I imagine the phones will be active.  On the other hand, $$ is a lot of hype.  Maybe they know what we do not--that his value is at the end of the round. On the other hand, the Panthers are in a very good spot if Sanders falls to #8.    
    • different viewpoint  Has that helped the Bengals?   …the eagles have premium receivers but they also mostly run the ball and rely heavily on those lines and rotation  football is, and will always be, build from the inside out  
    • https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/338015782?hl=en&sjid=3405130308313476774-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/338015782?hl=en&sjid=3405130308313476774-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/338015782?hl=en&sjid=3405130308313476774-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/338015782?hl=en&sjid=3405130308313476774-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/338015782?hl=en&sjid=3405130308313476774-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/338015782?hl=en&sjid=3405130308313476774-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/338015782?hl=en&sjid=3405130308313476774-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/338015782?hl=en&sjid=3405130308313476774-NC
×
×
  • Create New...