Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Civil lawsuit against J. Winston


Jmac

Recommended Posts

all I said was I'm pretty sure famous people don't need to rape a woman. They dont, sharper could easily have had a woman have consensual relations with him, which he did not. But regardless, Darren Sharpers case has no relation whatsoever to jameis winston's

 

And that's an incredibly stupid point of view.

 

By that logic (a word I'm using in the loosest possible sense here) a rich guy would never commit fraud or embezzlement because "he's already got a lot of money".

 

Believe it or not, famous / rich / good looking people actually do commit crimes too, including rape.  And despite what you may have seen in music videos, not every woman out there is willing to shed their panties at the drop of a hat just because a guy is rich and famous.

 

Google a guy by the name of Ted Bundy.  You might learn something.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Winston and Sharper are two very different situations and you shouldn't judge the two at the same time.

Very well could be.

However, those who believe that it is a lie because someone is rich, famous, or good looking are just flat wrong.

I think most of those on here asserting this view are just teenagers who have zero life experience nor understanding of real adult issues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Winston and Sharper are two very different situations and you shouldn't judge the two at the same time.

Honestly, a fair amount of the discussion hasn't even been directly about Winston.

People were just responding to a couple of dumbasses with idiotic attitudes about rape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's an incredibly stupid point of view.

By that logic (a word I'm using in the loosest possible sense here) a rich guy would never commit fraud or embezzlement because "he's already got a lot of money".

Believe it or not, famous / rich / good looking people actually do commit crimes too, including rape. And despite what you may have seen in music videos, not every woman out there is willing to shed their panties at the drop of a hat just because a guy is rich and famous.

Google a guy by the name of Ted Bundy. You might learn something.

I said that they don't need to, not that they wouldnt. Like for example a rich guy doesn't NEED to commit fraud or embezzlement for money but he CAN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said that they don't need to, not that they wouldnt. Like for example a rich guy doesn't NEED to commit fraud or embezzlement for money but he CAN

You implied that this was evidence against them doing it, which is utterly incorrect and frankly pretty dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't work that way. The judge and jury will still have to go through the evidence. The Title 9 hearing needed the least level of proof to find him responsible but was clear. The civil suit will follow the same result.

 

Two witnesses saw her on her knees giving him blowjob and the hospital also confirm the only bruise on her body was from standing on her knee. I think she's hoping Winston settles, that's why she did it just before draft. She wants him to fear his draft status will be affected. She's gonna get humiliated in court and make real rape victims look bad.

 

 

This is what I mean when I say that at every turn, Winston, Casher, and Darby (in addition to her own friends) story is supported by the evidence and hers is not. Casher and/or Darby testified that Erica was in Winston's room, on her knees, in a very compromising position. 

 

What do you know! The only bruises/redding on her entire body is her elbows and knees consistent with their story. No where in the Nurses report does it show that she had other bruising consistent with a violent sexual assault. 

 

She is the only one whose recollection of events is not consistent with everyone else's. 

 

She is also the only one whose recollection of events is unsupported by actual physical evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...