Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mumford & Sons: Wilder Mind - Terrible change in direction?


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

Mumford and Sons has made a change in direction that is straight up baffling, I understand if a band wants to try their hand at something different. But this is just is suck a departure from their first two albums it saddens me.

 

Babel was a fantastic album, but now we have this:

 

 

 

Believe is just terrible, and the Wolf isnt bad, but it's not the genre of music I want to hear when listening to Mumford and Sons.  they sound more like U2 now, and I dont like U2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

M&S was always overrated to begin with... my wife absolutely despises them and I tried to defend them for a long time, but everything they've released up to this point sounded like every other song they released.  maybe that's what they realized too and that's the thought behind the new direction

 

this is the first i'm listening to any of the new stuff... but I saw all over facebook that people were up in arms about the departure of their sound.  I honestly think it's not bad... much better than the monotonous stuff they've released on their last two albums

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I retract my previous statement a bit... the first song (is better than the first) sounded more like KoL... that second song sounds like good 'ole M&S, just without the banjo.  if they'd actually learn to play their instruments instead of just strumming the same chord really fast over and over again, they'd be much better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never been a fan of Mumford and Sons. Every time I heard them, all I could think about was how The Avett Brothers already did this 100x better, years earlier.

 

That being said, Marcus Mumford is a very talented dude. If you watch the documentary "Lost Songs: The Basement Tapes Continued", you can really see Marcus trying to get away from the same, tired M&S formula.

 

He even out right says something along the lines of, "I don't want to make the same song over and over."

 

So I'm not surprised at all they are trying something new. I haven't even listened to the new stuff, but I hope they follow it and don't return to their old sound just for the sake of it being safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never been a fan of Mumford and Sons. Every time I heard them, all I could think about was how The Avett Brothers already did this 100x better, years earlier.

I've always said that The Avett Brothers worked for years building the formula and then M&S swooped in and just copied it and cashed checks without having to put in any of the grunt work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i actually really really like it. believe could be a U2 or a coldplay song but i think they're doing what they have to to move forward as artists. you can't just play banjos and sing about being from rural england and never progress beyond that or people are ultimately going to get tired of your stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i actually dig it.

 

i loved their first album. didn't listen to much after.

 

i agree about them kind of swooping in on the avett bros. but swooping in on other talents and cashing checks has been done since the beginning of the recording industry so i dont really care. led zeppelin was stealing music from day 1 and they're widely considered the greatest rock n roll band in history. i mean "heart like a kickdrum" and gap commercials? don't be too snobby about this new sound.

 

marcus mumford is a really good dude and very talented too.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never been a fan of Mumford and Sons. Every time I heard them, all I could think about was how The Avett Brothers already did this 100x better, years earlier.

 

That being said, Marcus Mumford is a very talented dude. If you watch the documentary "Lost Songs: The Basement Tapes Continued", you can really see Marcus trying to get away from the same, tired M&S formula.

 

He even out right says something along the lines of, "I don't want to make the same song over and over."

 

So I'm not surprised at all they are trying something new. I haven't even listened to the new stuff, but I hope they follow it and don't return to their old sound just for the sake of it being safe.

Talk about a band that has lost their sound

Link to comment
Share on other sites

M&S was always overrated to begin with... my wife absolutely despises them and I tried to defend them for a long time, but everything they've released up to this point sounded like every other song they released.  maybe that's what they realized too and that's the thought behind the new direction

 

this is the first i'm listening to any of the new stuff... but I saw all over facebook that people were up in arms about the departure of their sound.  I honestly think it's not bad... much better than the monotonous stuff they've released on their last two albums

Overrated = I'm not a fan of that type of music.

 

I loved M&S before this current album that is about to release. there is nothing wrong with banjo's and strumming an instrument if it makes great music.

 

their old stuff was fantastic. to me this new album would be like Jay Z doing Country music, not only should it never happen, it's down right terrible.  if I wanted to listen to Coldplay/U2 poo I'd listen to them. but with M&S I want M&S not whatever this crap is.

 

at least I know the Avett Brothers will never let me down in this regard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...