Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much should I sell my xbox one for...

Donald LaFell

By Donald LaFell,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

I've been pricing them on Craigslist and ebay for a while now. For a fair sell do $250. Quick sale, $220. If you want to wait a while go $300 but you'll probably have to lower it.

You take a big hit for a variety of reasons, some people don't like the games you do or care about kinect, but selling them all separately will cost you more time that isn't worth it. Console bundled with accessories is a bad way to go. The only way I see you getting more than GameStop is the trade in your games for credit and sell the console elsewhere and you might get around $300-$320.

Te GameStop deal isn't bad if you're just going to turn around and buy a ps4, I'd take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cptx Rising Star

cptx

Posted
Posted

I've been pricing them on Craigslist and ebay for a while now. For a fair sell do $250. Quick sale, $220. If you want to wait a while go $300 but you'll probably have to lower it.

You take a big hit for a variety of reasons, some people don't like the games you do or care about kinect, but selling them all separately will cost you more time that isn't worth it. Console bundled with accessories is a bad way to go. The only way I see you getting more than GameStop is the trade in your games for credit and sell the console elsewhere and you might get around $300-$320.

Te GameStop deal isn't bad if you're just going to turn around and buy a ps4, I'd take it.

 

Sounds about right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

I agree with the people mentioning gamestop. if you are trading in for something else there you actually get a pretty good deal. 

 

source: had a red ring xbox 360 and some games and controllers and got a great deal on an xbone 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Donald LaFell Veteran

Donald LaFell

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Xbox has better games at the moment. I'm not sure why you're changing.

 

All of my old friends have Xbone but it's hard to play with them, all my work friends have PS4 and it's easy enough to game with them. I[ve never played The last of us and I hear they're going to remaster uncharted. 

 

Also mine kept freezing and i was having odd issues with it I figured i should get rid of it before it craps out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mol3m4n Mentor

Mol3m4n

Posted
Posted

All of my old friends have Xbone but it's hard to play with them, all my work friends have PS4 and it's easy enough to game with them. I[ve never played The last of us and I hear they're going to remaster uncharted.

Also mine kept freezing and i was having odd issues with it I figured i should get rid of it before it craps out.

That's understandable. I first got my 360 because all of my friends gamed on it. I've got older and can't do the same stuff, so that's why I'm bigger on the single player xbox games.

I Luke uncharted, and the last of us is in my top 10 games, but I don't want to pay them again when I can play them on my PS3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...