Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy to choose between Cowboys and Bucs

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Igo Newbie

Jeremy Igo

Posted
Posted

 

Former Carolina Panthers defensive end Greg Hardy, who is undergoing a physical this morning in Dallas, is expected to choose Wednesday between the Cowboys and Tampa Bay Buccaneers, agent Drew Rosenhaus told ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter.

Hardy and the Cowboys have had ongoing negotiations, and the player stayed overnight in Dallas before the scheduled physical.

 

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/12505929/greg-hardy-pickdallas-cowboys-tampa-bay-buccaneers-agent-says?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

 

 

Looks like Seattle may be out of the running for now. 

 

 

The good news... with a bidding war happening there is a good chance the dollar amount is high enough to help the Panthers get a 3rd round compensatory pick in 2016. 

 

Tampa may be a good personal fit for Hardy though. Lots of clubs, bikinis, night life etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
coralreefer_1 Newbie

coralreefer_1

Posted
Posted

I prefer the Bucs. Hardy is a great player of course, and i know many of you fear seeing him opposing our line...but if we cant compete against the likes of Hardy on another team, and sooo afraid of him...we have no place competing for a championship!

 

I say bring it on! Either we as a team step up to the challenge of elite play...or go back to the cellar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...