-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
By UNCrules2187 · Posted
Also if Brooks is the real deal, by the time he would need to be paid, Chuba's deal will be easily ready to be off the books. As most are saying, it's essentially a 2-year deal and then "we'll see." -
By R0CKnR0LLA · Posted
Kinda torn on this one. Generally I think it's a bad idea to pay FA RBs. On the other hand, this deal is really not bad at all. Was expecting him to get around 5 year, 55-60 mill as a FA. 4 years with only 15 guaranteed is very reasonable. Even if he completely flops, it won't hurt the team that much. And if he balls out at maxes out the deal, it's still only a little over $8 mill a year at most. Honestly, don't hate it. -
By CamWhoaaCam · Posted
RB is not a valuable position. That money could have went to a starter on defense. That's why you drafted Brooks in the 2nd Rd. Think about what I just said. We drafted a RB in the 2nd Rd for him to backup a RB we just gave top 10 money. We basically valuing the wrong positions for depth. This defense is flat out atrocious and we handing out quality money to a RB. That money could have went to a starter on defense. Cmon man make it make sense.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.