Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Taking less money


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Word out of Green Bay is that before accepting his new contract from the Packers, Randall Cobb was actually offered a deal that would have paid him two million a year higher by the Oakland Raiders.

 

Although relatively rare, stories of players taking less money from one team than they might have made elsewhere do happen every so often.  Our own Mike Tolbert is an example.  He turned down a higher offer from San Diego than what he ultimately signed for from the Panthers.  Not two million a year higher, mind you, but higher nonetheless.

 

So, putting yourself in the shoes of an NFL free agent (admittedly nice shoes to be in) can you imagine a situation where you'd walk away from something like two million a year to play somewhere else?

 

if so, what sorts of things would factor into that decision?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some people are too focused on the money side. Yes money is important but people are different. They are motivated by different things. To assume every player is only after money generalizes all of the players and, Imo, keeps us from looking at them as people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might be a smart move in the long run by Cobb.  He's only 24. He'll hit the open market again at 28, plenty young enough to land another big deal.  He'll likely be far better positioned to do that by continuing on with Rodgers and GB than he would be by rolling the dice and going to Oakland.  Could make a lot bigger difference than $2M per year on his next deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Cobb's situation is a little different. He's only 24 and if he goes out to Oakland now there's a chance he falls off the face of the earth without a QB and isn't a big deal when he hits the market again. He stays with Rodgers in GB and has another solid 4 years, he'll hit the market again at 28 and could possibly get another solid contract.

Edit: LG beat me to it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might be a smart move in the long run by Cobb.  He's only 24. He'll hit the open market again at 28, plenty young enough to land another big deal.  He'll likely be far better positioned to do that by continuing on with Rodgers and GB than he would be by rolling the dice and going to Oakland.  Could make a lot bigger difference than $2M per year on his next deal.

 

 

I think Cobb's situation is a little different. He's only 24 and if he goes out to Oakland now there's a chance he falls off the face of the earth without a QB and isn't a big deal when he hits the market again. He stays with Rodgers in GB and has another solid 4 years, he'll hit the market again at 28 and could possibly get another solid contract.

Edit: LG beat me to it

 

 

 

Exactly this.

 

While I'm sure it's tempting to take a higher salary now, Cobb is playing it smart by sticking with the best QB in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The philosophy of the management, the coaching, whether or not the team has a good chance of winning, my role, the camaraderie between teammates, the team culture, whether my family liked the community, how deeply embedded that my roots are within the community and whether I see the place as "home",  standard of living, taxes, etc. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some people are too focused on the money side. Yes money is important but people are different. They are motivated by different things. To assume every player is only after money generalizes all of the players and, Imo, keeps us from looking at them as people.

 

Valid, but to be fair a lot of these guys have families to take care of.

 

Would you wanna go tell your wife and kids you just turned down two million a year extra? :blink:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Valid, but to be fair a lot of these guys have families to take care of.

 

Would you wanna go tell your wife and kids you just turned down two million a year extra? :blink:

 

 

That depends on if I'm already making millions or peanuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah don't get me started on that. He ran cam into the ground
    • I once again wake up eat my breakfast and then read bs…man your logic only works in your head I can give you multiple examples but I’ll start with one easy clear example of it matters who you’re getting and what you’re planning on doing. Jadevon C and Khalil Mack were drafted before Aaron Donald 2014 biggest mistake of the draft as we look back and redraft or whatever. It doesn’t make sense to take a DE over a DT thats a stud game changing elite defensive player. You can’t draft of generalization typically you want a DE first but nowadays DT are just as impactful so you better choose right LA got a chip bc of Donald meanwhile K Mack is on his second team and J Clowney on his third  team. We don’t draft positions we draft elite prospects Graham seems to be a more productive disruptive player than either DE we may get. A Carter who I want is a Micah P clone they say I can see him impacting the pass game but the run game might leave him as a non factor. And right now our main focal point on defense this offseason will be stopping the run. We’ll be able to create pressure with A Barno back Wonnum healthy and a mix of blitzing which has helped us generate pass rush lately.  Graham if he allows us to stop the run and he generates a pass rush himself which at Michigan he’s know to do both consistently helps our defense then start controlling games would be a better pick then Carter for us moving forward so let’s dive deeper then just pick a DE over a DT because there’s so many factors to weigh out with these top ten picks in the nfl draft.
×
×
  • Create New...