Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Derrick Morgan hints at meeting with the Panthers

Sam Mills Fan

By Sam Mills Fan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

I agree with Rum...

There's no need to downplay Hardy to make Morgan look good..

If Morgan is actually doing more then looking in the sky...it will be a solid signing for this team..

But Hardy was a beast for us and a big loss for this team .. it dam near took us half the season to learn to play defense without him..

#Facts

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SIGCHI222 Newbie

SIGCHI222

Posted
Posted

I've asked this a few times.. "Carolina Blue skies" is a phrase people use outside of the Carolinas. N

 

I have lived in California, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Colorado, South Carolina and North Carolina.

 

 

Never heard anyone ever use the term "Carolina Blue Skies" or even "Carolina Blue" outside of North Carolina.

 

Baby blue...yes.   Carolina blue...no.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted

I loved Hardy as a player, but not a $13m player. He was a good DE in our system for reasons I mentioned. Your point about his versatility is very valid. Morgan might be a decent alternative, but he will not be that great. I think Hardy could move around because he was not the focus in 2013--We have others on D who drew doubles, blocking from backs--they paid for not paying attention to GH.

I don't know how good GH would be in Tennessee. I am guessing he would never have had 15 sacks.

I hear DG is in love with the UCLA DE whose name I can easily spell and pronounce but choose not to.

He probably would not have gotten 15 sacks but who knows doesn't really matter. the thing with Hardy. His talent is on the rise. I'm not gonna believe this kid is going to be the same type of player for us as hardy simply because the eye test doesn't donit for me. Not saying he couldn't help us, I think he could.

I think people genuinely forget how much of a monster he was. He was damn near everywhere on the field. He was dominant in run support, rushing the passer and he never ever gave up. Other players fed off his craziness. That's the type of defensive end we want and that's rare. Too bad he is a fugtard off the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SIGCHI222 Newbie

SIGCHI222

Posted
Posted

He probably would not have gotten 15 sacks but who knows doesn't really matter. the thing with Hardy. His talent is on the rise. I'm not gonna believe this kid is going to be the same type of player for us as hardy simply because the eye test doesn't donit for me. Not saying he couldn't help us, I think he could.

I think people genuinely forget how much of a monster he was. He was damn near everywhere on the field. He was dominant in run support, rushing the passer and he never ever gave up. Other players fed off his craziness. That's the type of defensive end we want and that's rare. Too bad he is a fugtard off the field.

 

Can we get t-shirts that say this and move on?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

Do you see people in Charlotte staring upward and saying "Man, looks like a great Montana sky up there"?

Montana Blue isn't considered a color. .

Carolina or Baby blue is actually considered a color..

Still no official word Morgan and the team are even talking..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

I have lived in California, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Colorado, South Carolina and North Carolina.

Never heard anyone ever use the term "Carolina Blue Skies" or even "Carolina Blue" outside of North Carolina.

Baby blue...yes. Carolina blue...no.

I have in DC, Virginia, California, Pennsylvania, NY, GA and Tennessee. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

1. He got hit in the motorcycle accident.. do you even know the story?? Why make a dumb statement without knowing the story. .

2. We don't know his guns were laying around. . Again you call a girl a crack ho.. but believe her story like it was fact.. Do you usually follow the opinions of crack hoes??

3. We don't know if he even paid her.. The defense said a settlement was reached.. that doesn't mean it was money. . But even if it was a lot of people and companies settle out in stead of going thru a court case.. that doesn't mean he was guilty of anything. . Maybe he was advised by his lawyers not to let this drag out so he can get back in the league as soon as possible. .

Also anybody who actually followed the case can see that nobody in the case was credible. . So picking guilt or innocence in a he said she said case is stupid. N

 

Before you go around using words like "dumb" and "stupid", you better read some of your own posts.  You should be very humble in that department. One of the great ironies in life is that people who actually are dumb are usually too stupid to know it. So keep preaching from your pulpit of assumed wisdom, and maybe some idiots will believe you.  

 

Who ever said I needed evidence from court to decide that Hardy has character issues?  When a "settlement:" is reached, what do you think that means?  A guy was just given $12m for doing nothing and he has a chance to clear his name in court. There is a "settlement." The girl goes away, case is dismissed, you presume innocence.  An innocent man would clear his name by having his day in court.  When a person with a ton of money "settles" out of court and the witness in his case disappears, there is no platform for you to start yelling, "We don't know..."  We, Roger Goodell, and Jerry Richardson, do not need a conviction to know what happened based on statements that were presented during the process.  The photo of the speedometer, the act of riding a motorcycle, etc.  suggest stupid decisions.  I don't even think a few random statements from a few teammates means the entire team wants him back--we don't know, do we?

 

This forum is the court of public opinion...The court of the NFL-that is all that matters but one you refuse to acknowledge. He would be crucified under the new NFL rules, but the Rice ruling will probably cause Goodell to go easy on him.  Does that make him innocent?   I was pointing to things that suggest character flaws, and you defend each one as if you just got a junior lawyer kit at Walmart.  I make assumptions about people every day without court reports to go by, and I am usually right.

 

Now that you are the defender of the wrongly oppressed, why don't you defend Bill Cosby and celebrate his contributions to humanity?  Anyone who calls him a rapist based on the statements of other women has a right to do so without a conviction.  We don't need courts to think for ourselves--especially when the people with money start buying silence. 

 

Take that junior lawyer kit back to Walmart and get your $2.99 back.  It has no use here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...