Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Everybody hates Jay


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Well maybe not everybody, but apparently a lot of people...

 

At least 10 former Chicago Bears staffers from the Lovie Smith and Marc Trestman regimes said recently they believe the team can't consistently compete for championships as long as it fields a lineup with Jay Cutler under center.

That sentiment might explain why head coach John Fox and general manager Ryan Pace remain uncommitted to Cutler as the team's starting quarterback for 2015. Deciding whether to commit to Cutler has a time element. If Cutler is on the Bears' roster on March 12, $10 million of his 2016 salary is guaranteed.

Cutler declined comment through a team spokesman. His agent, Bus Cook, said questions about whether the Bears feel they can win with Cutler should be directed to the team.

Two teammates, who also asked to remain anonymous for this story, characterized Cutler as a divisive figure with whom they'd rather not continue to play.

In six years with the Bears, Cutler has gone through four offensive coordinators, two head coaches and a pair of general managers. Yet Cutler remains very much in play as the team's potential long-term solution at the position, in part, because of the seven-year, $126.7 million extension the quarterback signed in January 2014.

One more former staffer said the Bears could win with Cutler as long as the coaches handcuff him to the system.

 

Former coaches doubt Bears can win with Jay Cutler

 

And somewhere out there, Philip Rivers is laughing his head off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought this thread was about SuperJ

 

Everybody hates him too.

 

 

How about give him a little bit of stability? He has to deal with one chump after another as far as HC and OC.

That franchise is in chaos and hes the easy scapegoat. Sure he didnt perform well but who did in that org?

 

As I recall, one of his former QB Coaches was let go specifically because Cutler demanded it.

 

Won't deny the org has been terrible, but Cutler is actually one of the terrible decisions they made.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you take his first name, convert it to a French homonym "J' ai" and put it in front of his last name, a form of the English word, "Cutlery."  Now take the actual French version of his last name "coutelerie" and put it in front of the French homonym, "J'ai Coutelerie."  Translate back to English and you get,
"I have knives."

 

See? It was right there in front of us all along.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Not intended to make much sense)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When a team is willing to trade a 3rd year QB coming off of a 4500+ yard passing season, it's gotta raise all kinds of red flags.  It doesn't matter what the compensation is, teams don't let elite young franchise QBs go.  The Bears should've seen it coming.  They were had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you take his first name, convert it to a French homonym "J' ai" and put it in front of his last name, a form of the English word, "Cutlery."  Now take the actual French version of his last name "coutelerie" and put it in front of the French homonym, "J'ai Coutelerie."  Translate back to English and you get,

"I have knives."

 

See? It was right there in front of us all along.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Not intended to make much sense)

 

it's French, no one cares....though it is fitting since Cutler is a big emo pussy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you take his first name, convert it to a French homonym "J' ai" and put it in front of his last name, a form of the English word, "Cutlery."  Now take the actual French version of his last name "coutelerie" and put it in front of the French homonym, "J'ai Coutelerie."  Translate back to English and you get,

"I have knives."

 

See? It was right there in front of us all along.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Not intended to make much sense)

 

 

On a side note,Yaj Reltuc is his named spelled backwards. LOL :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always thought he sucked and was still amazed they traded what they did for him. I also almost got in a fight at my former job with an idiot bears fan because he said Cam wasn't a championship qb and I said the cutler sucks and no team can ever compete with him because he's emo, inaccurate, and wildly inconsistent. Good times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would understand it--especially if DJ Johnson, Barno, and Wonnum finish strong.  Graham, however, might not be the best fit for Carolina with Brown back.  Our DTs have underperformed (Tuttle, Robinson) and they can be cut and save about $13m, or one can be cut and save $6.5m.  Who might be a better fit than Graham?   Maybe the guy beside him--Graham's sidekick, Kenneth Grant, is also a beast.  You could argue that he benefited by playing with Graham, just as he would in Carolina beside Brown.  However, teams like to double the big NT/3 tech, and if you do that, you get Browned.  Grant is a 340 lb DT who has 3 sacks this year--against Ohio State, Saturday, he had 5 QB pressures--and he has been doing that all year.  They could not block him.  If you want a player who compliments Brown (as opposed to rotating in with him) I would take a long look at Grant--in round two if he is there--after drafting an Edge in round 1.  In my view, THAT would solve the running game issues and give us pocket collapsing pressure up the A gap.  There is also a DT from Kentucky I like in this role, but Graham is good.
    • He is a free agent after this season. Do you want to pay him like a top kicker?  He can't kick much from past 50 yards. 
    • I don't know how anybody watches this team this season and has this take.  We are miles better than we were week 1.    If we were slightly better he would be in serious contention for coach of the year, and he should be. My only concern right now is that we win too much and lose draft position to get even better. 
×
×
  • Create New...