Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Optimum Scouting uses Stephen Hill as a case study.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Matt Harmon of Optimum Scouting has written a sobering article on Stephen Hill that is somewhere between not quite scathing and not quite apologetic, but wholly critical.  Stephen Hill is the example set forth---a warning really---for why wide receivers fail.  His premise seems to be that teams need to be more careful when evaluating the players to mitigate what I'll coin as the Combine Super Measuables Effect, and that scouts must be realistic about whether or not a player can develop in a less than desired (basically crappy) circumstance, or would benefit by getting some time to grow, lest they be irrevocable spoiled by their surroundings.

 

Hill is still somewhat of an enigma---somewhere between heaven and hell---wide receiver purgatory.  According to the article there is still some hope, but the arrow is starting to point downward.

 

Even for Stephen Hill, the story is not over yet, although the pages are hanging to the book spine by tattered threads. As Michael Irvin asserted when airing his thoughts on Hill, perhaps it was the situation and quarterback tornado in New York that prevented the young receiver from developing into a technically proficient player, and deadly threat. Perhaps that happens now that he’s entering his second season in what appears to be a Carolina Panthers’ developmental program for him. Maybe the conclusion we can draw from Hill’s short NFL career is that situation and fit with his team is more paramount to a receiver’s development, and therefore public perception, than his individual skills.

 

 

And I would be remiss to not offer a quote about receivers in this year's draft whom he considers in the Stephen Hill mold.

 

So, who are the receivers in that Stephen Hill mold, that have gotten by almost exclusively on their physical gifts, in the 2015 draft class? The two that come to mind immediately are DeVante Parker and Sammie Coates. Pakrer is the more highly touted prospect, and is a consensus top-three wide receiver in this class.

 

 

Shocking for some of you, I am sure.  But it's a good read---something different.  This time of year, any fan should be able to appreciate that.  Even if you don't agree with the article, kudos to Optimum Scouting and Harmon.

 

http://optimumscouting.com/draft/nfl-draft-failed-stephen-hill-wide-receiver.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=nfl-draft-failed-stephen-hill-wide-receiver

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coates I can see, but Parker?  No.  Parker very well could bust, but not because he's out of the Stephen Hill mode.  Hill only caught 49 passes in his entire college career.  Hell, he only caught 28 passes his final year in college, but he averaged damn near 30 yards per catch.  It was pretty clear that Hill was a deep threat and a deep threat only coming out of college.  Kinda like Coates.  Parker only played 7 games last season due to injury and still caught 43 passes for 855 yards and 5 TDs... in 7 games.

 

Sammie Coates' stats last season?  34 catches for 741 yards and 4 TDs.  21.8 ypc average.  Now it's legit to use Hill as a precautionary tale when it comes to Coates.

 

Comparing Devante Parker to Stephen Hill is just idiotic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parker scare me tha the most catches he ever made in a given year was 55 in his four year career at louisville.

 

If you just look at the raw stats, sure.  But, look deeper.  He improved every year.  18 catches for 291 yards and 6 TDs as a freshman.  40 catches for 744 yards and 10 TDs as a sophomore.  55 catches for 885 yards and 12 TDs as a junior.  Then, in an injury shortened senior season, he caught 43 passes for 855 yards in only 7 games.  Extrapolate that out to 12 games and you get 73 catches for 1454 yards.  That's a beast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, I forgot about Hill as well.  So like, what if he ends up working out this year?  That would be awesome.

 

He's big as hell, and fast as poo.

 

If we do end up drafting a receiver it doesn't need to be one of those "raw prospect" types.  We've got enough of those on our hands with KB, Brown, and Hill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, I forgot about Hill as well.  So like, what if he ends up working out this year?  That would be awesome.

 

He's big as hell, and fast as poo.

 

If we do end up drafting a receiver it doesn't need to be one of those "raw prospect" types.  We've got enough of those on our hands with KB, Brown, and Hill.

 

And Lucas (Mucas)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we do end up drafting a receiver it doesn't need to be one of those "raw prospect" types.  We've got enough of those on our hands with KB, Brown, and Hill.

 

KB definitely has a lot of room for improvement, but "raw prospects" don't have 1,000 receiving yards as a rookie while serving as their team's #1 WR.  I actually think Brown is fairly polished as a route runner.  He really impressed me as a receiver last year.  Hill was just a shot in the dark on a former draft bust who can run really fast.  If he works out, great.  If not, nothing lost.

 

IMO, adding a true field stretcher at WR would make a big difference.  It could really open up a lot of room underneath for KB, Olsen, and Philly to go to work.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KB definitely has a lot of room for improvement, but "raw prospects" don't have 1,000 receiving yards as a rookie while serving as their team's #1 WR.  I actually think Brown is fairly polished as a route runner.  He really impressed me as a receiver last year.  Hill was just a shot in the dark on a former draft bust who can run really fast.  If he works out, great.  If not, nothing lost.

 

IMO, adding a true field stretcher at WR would make a big difference.  It could really open up a lot of room underneath for KB, Olsen, and Philly to go to work.

 

 

I could be wrong, but I think that Corey Brown is going to be relegated to the bench for the most part.  In my mind, he is a WR4 or 5.  He would have done so much for his importance if he had just learned to hold onto the ball during special teams.  Sure he had the Steekers game where he showed some mediocre route running ability, but he didn't get the separation and YAC (2.7 average) that I would have liked to have seen out of a guy with his speed.  Plus, he is just too small for my taste to be playing across the middle where he can get racked up. He is arguably injury prone. Brown is at his best being a one-trick Pony, flying down the field for a bomb. 

 

To your point, another weapon may make it easier for him to do his thing, but I just don't see a bigger, more polished receiver not keeping Brown on the bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know much. I know catching the ball, knowing playbook, and route tree are very important to being a WR. If you're a 6'5 250 lbs, runs a 4.13 40 dash, 5sec three crone, etc etc all that. Then a play is called; you lineup wrong, run the wrong route, gets open and QB throws a perfect soft pass.... and you drop it. Repeat all that months later, well you're not a nfl WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Devante Parker is far better than any numbers will show.

He missed more than half the games this season with a broken foot and still came back and dominated.

Last year with Teddy Bridgewater (who always spreads the ball around) they would come out on fire and then cruise after 14pts. Charlie Strong made John Fox look like Bill Belicheck.

Parker will be fine. He's far better coming out than Hill is now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could be wrong, but I think that Corey Brown is going to be relegated to the bench for the most part.  In my mind, he is a WR4 or 5.  He would have done so much for his importance if he had just learned to hold onto the ball during special teams.  Sure he had the Steekers game where he showed some mediocre route running ability, but he didn't get the separation and YAC (2.7 average) that I would have liked to have seen out of a guy with his speed.  Plus, he is just too small for my taste to be playing across the middle where he can get racked up. He is arguably injury prone. Brown is at his best being a one-trick Pony, flying down the field for a bomb. 

 

To your point, another weapon may make it easier for him to do his thing, but I just don't see a bigger, more polished receiver not keeping Brown on the bench.

 

I don't necessarily disagree with most of what you said.  I'd love to see a decent vet brought in and another draft pick added to the mix at WR. 

 

The one thing I do disagree with is Brown's speed.  I just don't see.  He strikes me as being quicker than fast.  I don't get all this talk about him possibly being the fastest player on the Panthers roster and all this hype about his speed.  He was a 4.5 guy at the combine and honestly, he plays like a 4.5 guy on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way in hell that Brenton Bersin is better than Stephen Hill. This organization's plans for Hill in the future are a real head scratcher. You would think if Cam made use of Ginn he could make use of Hill.

 

Bersin isn't much of a WR, but he did catch the majority of the balls that came his way.  Everyone who saw Hill at camp basically said he couldn't catch anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/12642811-can-i-change-the-name-on-my-cruise-reservation-guest-service-24hr-short
    • I'm not a fan for a couple reasons. You have to nail your 1st 2 picks, especially when you're lacking as much talent across the board as we were and you traded away the number 1 overall pick. Barring injury, they need to be immediate 4 year starters, and on this team, that's a pretty low bar to hurdle. I also really hated the FA strategy building up to the draft, particularly the guards, and the draft strategy itself. A strategy that focused on building around a QB that was so terrible he had no business being on the field. It was clear to pretty much everyone, BY wasn't ready to be an NFL starter. We dumped everything to build around him in the hopes he would become what we drafted him to be. And while the end of the year started showing some promise, we still don't know going into year 3 if he's going to live up to the hype. Dumping all your resources to build around a single player (and hope for the best) isn't as important as building a complete team.  If there's any certainty in drafting, it's HQ interior linemen are found in rounds 2-3, and even 4 pretty regularly. Dumping a ton of FA cash into those 2 spots didn't make sense when we have so many holes. Draft guards, pay tackles. It's one of the staple principles of oline building.  XL was always a project. He didn't have years of consistent high end performance in college. His hands are bricks, he body catches a lot, and he looks more like a 4th round receiver than a 1st. Maybe he improves, maybe not. He looked extremely raw as a rookie and we can only hope he might develop by the time his rookie contract expires. I'm always a fan of drafting guys that actually have hands coming out of college. Who cares if you can get open, or fight for the ball, when you can't actually come down with it consistently.  Then we get to Brooks. Taking a RB with a torn ACL who may or may not see the field in 24/25 over Zach Frasier, who already looks the vet at a position we've been severely deficient at since pre-injury Ryan Kalil. Relying on Corbett, coming off injury, to move from guard to center is never ideal, and the injury bug bit yet again, and we were scrambling trying to find someone to lead our 200m offensive line. And the worst part, we traded up to do it giving up 2 5ths to take Brooks when we're lacking talent everywhere.  Wallace, meh. Sanders looked good before that neck injury. But now we're into day 3 where expectations aren't extremely high for making the roster, unless it's the Panthers, but you can find some position players and rotational players to start plugging the Swiss cheese roster.  I give him credit for getting Coker as an UDFA and the trade for Jackson, but if that's the highlight of your draft, there's some serious problems with your drafting.  If we had saved the FA money spent on the guards, drafted JPJ and Frazier, and still been in pretty close to the same spot, better off cash wise (or spent on other FAs) going into FA this year. Coker ended up playing better than XL in less time. Brooks is Eric Shelton 2.0 right now. And we used 5 picks in the 1st 2 rounds, if you count those included in the trades. That's too much given up for a team that won 2 games the year prior. JMO, but I think the whole offseason strategy last year was flawed from start to finish.  
    • Everything hinges on his ability to build through the draft so it's unknown until we see the upcoming draft class in action. That's all that will ultimately matter. We cannot afford anymore duds or projects especially in the early rounds.
×
×
  • Create New...