Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Remianing Schedules for Teams fighting for 7 & 8 spots

bLACKpANTHER

By bLACKpANTHER,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

bLACKpANTHER Proficient

bLACKpANTHER

Posted
Posted

I did this real quick and didn't bother to cross-check to see if I have both teams winning or losing a matchup they both play in, but anyways-- here goes nuthin:

Hornets 24-33:

LAL - W

@BRK - W

TOR - L

@DET - W

WASH - W

SAC - W

CHI - W

@UTH - W

@LAC - L

@SAC - W

@MIN - W

@CHI - L

BRK - W

@WASH - L

ATL - L

BOS - W

DET - W

@IND - L

PHI - W

@MIA - W

TOR - W

@ATL - L

@DET - L

HOU - L

@TOR - W

40-42

--------

Nets 24-33:

GSW - L

CHA - L

PHO - L

UTH - W

NOP - W

@MIA - L

@PHI - W

@MIN - W

@CLE - L

MIL - L

@IND - L

BOS - W

@CHA - L

CLE - L

LAL - W

IND - W

@NYK - W

TOR - L

@ATL - L

POR - L

ATL - L

WASH - L

@MIL - L

CHI - L

ORL - W

33-49

------

Pacers 25-34:

NYK - W

CHI - L

@NYK - W

ORL - W

MIL - L

BOS - W

TOR - L

@CHI - L

@CLE - L

BRK - W

HOU - L

@WASH - L

@MIL - L

DAL - L

@BRK - W

@BOS - W

CHA - L

MIA - W

@NYK - W

@DET - L

OKC - L

WASH - W

@MEM - L

35-47

--------

Heat 25-33:

PHO - W

LAL - W

@WASH - L

SAC - W

BOS - W

BRK - W

@TOR - L

CLE - L

POR - L

DEN - W

@OKC - L

@MIL - L

@BOS - W

@ATL - L

DET - L

SAS - L

@CLE - L

@DET - W

@IND - W

CHA - L

CHI - L

TOR - L

ORL - W

@PHI - W

36-46

--------

#7 Hornets and #8 Heat

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted

I love BP... great poster, but I think the hornets colored lens influenced those wins and losses projections... I wouldn't worry about us rocketing up to 7th because I just don't see it from this team. We're far too inconsistent. I just watched parts of the Nets and Heat game last night and we are not better than them.

The addition of Whiteside and Dragic for the Heat and Thad Young for the Nets WERE HUGE. They look like different teams. Out addition of MO was, standing on its own, better than any move at the deadline, imo, considering what we gave up. But the reason their moves were better was because their teams were already better constructed than ours. The guys they picked up were the only piece their puzzles were missing, while MO was one of many in ours.

It's going to be a struggle, but I only see 8th or the lottery, and I'm leaning heavily towards it being the lottery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Omega Atrocity Newbie

Omega Atrocity

Posted
Posted

I love BP... great poster, but I think the hornets colored lens influenced those wins and losses projections... I wouldn't worry about us rocketing up to 7th because I just don't see it from this team. We're far too inconsistent. I just watched parts of the Nets and Heat game last night and we are not better than them.

The addition of Whiteside and Dragic for the Heat and Thad Young for the Nets WERE HUGE. They look like different teams. Out addition of MO was, standing on its own, better than any move at the deadline, imo, considering what we gave up. But the reason their moves were better was because their teams were already better constructed than ours. The guys they picked up were the only piece their puzzles were missing, while MO was one of many in ours.

It's going to be a struggle, but I only see 8th or the lottery, and I'm leaning heavily towards it being the lottery.

The Nets and Heat aren't good either. We're a bad team, but we definitely have a chance at being better than both of them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted

The Nets and Heat aren't good either. We're a bad team, but we definitely have a chance at being better than both of them.

In my puzzle metaphor, I didn't mean to make it sound as though their additions were the only thing they needed to be a contender. I meant the guys they added were the only pieces they needed to secure themselves at playoff bound teams. We on the other hand, have far too many issues outside of MO.

And maybe I just caught them on a good night, but I'm telling you omega, they aren't bad like we are, and at the very least, they are better than we are.

I would love to be wrong, but I see them more than likely pulling away from us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Omega Atrocity Newbie

Omega Atrocity

Posted
Posted

In my puzzle metaphor, I didn't mean to make it sound as though their additions were the only thing they needed to be a contender. I meant the guys they added were the only pieces they needed to secure themselves at playoff bound teams. We on the other hand, have far too many issues outside of MO.

And maybe I just caught them on a good night, but I'm telling you omega, they aren't bad like we are, and at the very least, they are better than we are.

I would love to be wrong, but I see them more than likely pulling away from us.

I watch the Nets and Heat a fair amount, and they are just as inconsistent as we are imo.

The Heat have been getting hype all year about being a sneaky good team, they got Whiteside and he's been the steal of the last few years. But they're still sitting well below .500 and are losing games they shouldn't on paper.

The Nets are paying Johnson, Williams, and Lopez about 55 million this year. No team setup like that will be decent. They are better since they acquired Thad, but I'm still,not worried about them.

I honestly worry more about Indy than either of those teams. They're well coached and George will probably come back fairly soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bLACKpANTHER Proficient

bLACKpANTHER

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I did this real quick and didn't bother to cross-check to see if I have both teams winning or losing a matchup they both play in, but anyways-- here goes nuthin:

Hornets 24-33:

LAL - W

@BRK - W

TOR - L (W)

@DET - W

WASH - W (L)

SAC - W

CHI - W

@UTH - W

@LAC - L

@SAC - W

@MIN - W

@CHI - L

BRK - W

@WASH - L

ATL - L

BOS - W

DET - W

@IND - L

PHI - W

@MIA - W

TOR - W

@ATL - L

@DET - L

HOU - L

@TOR - W

40-42

--------

 

so far on track.. this loss to Washington isn't unexpected.. 4 games in 5 nights and we drop 1.. im cool.. i just wish it wasn't against my local team here in DC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Okay, so answer this one then, since you said you can't answer something you don't think will happen...... You have said numerous times in the past that even though you want them, you don't think Deion will allow us to take his son or Hunter. You then taking Ward #1 over T-Mac just because he's the QB?
    • Shocker
      Game thread

      By Shocker · Posted

      Thanks for that sounds very interesting.   I have a scientific mind usually and don’t believe in wide spread conspiracy theories but with the NBA it’s so obvious.  The fuggin rigged draft is something only an idiot wouldn’t see.  But the NBA is 100% about big market money.  It’s not even a real league.  It’s 10 teams that have a shot.
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      This response is absolutely and utterly insane, I've literally this same thing out multiple times in previous posts about mock drafts, like a bunch of times. I've never once denied it's a possibility of them going #1, I've just said that I wouldn't take them there. And YET AGAIN, you're proving that you don't believe they are elite QB prospects, you literally just said "first prospects off the board REGARDLESS OF TALENT" It's literally what I've been saying this whole time, these QB's don't have the draft grades to deserve that pick.  They're only being mocked there because mocks are trying to predict the draft, not saying who deserves to be drafted where.   Dude, this is exactly why I question your reading comprehension skills.  You keep trying to say you got me with something, but in those exact posts you're just proving my points, the literal opposite of catching me in some lie or moment of ignorance.
×
×
  • Create New...