Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Final Decision On Hardy : No Thanks


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

You know what also irks me about the whole way that Hardy was handled? If the Panthers really weren't interested in re-signing Hardy, then they may as well had played him. We would have gotten our money's worth as opposed to him getting 13 million dollars for basically nothing. Oh, that's right, it hurt Jerry Richardson's sensibilities and would have caused the team---and more importantly, the shield---irreparable harm. Richardson couldn't be more like the 49ers with Ray McDonald who really had something invested in their player than we had in a player whom we were kicking to the curb anyway.  

 

We could have gotten our money's worth, then kicked Hardy to the curb, but for Richardson acting like a pussy cat as opposed to a Panther.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what also irks me about the whole way that Hardy was handled? If the Panthers really weren't interested in re-signing Hardy, then they may as well had played him. We would have gotten our money's worth as opposed to him getting 13 million dollars for basically nothing. Oh, that's right, it hurt Jerry Richardson's sensibilities and would have caused the team---and more importantly, the shield---irreparable harm. Richardson couldn't be more like the 49ers with Ray McDonald who really had something invested in their player than we had in a player whom we were kicking to the curb anyway.  

 

We could have gotten our money's worth, then kicked Hardy to the curb, but for Richardson acting like a pussy cat as opposed to a Panther.

 

why didn't they play him?  because roger goodell would have suspended him without pay if we did.  gettleman was open about the fact that discipline from the panthers wasn't on the table in the joint press conference that he gave with ron rivera after hardy was de-activated against detroit.  the exempt list was a favor to hardy but he pissed all over it by barely showing his face in the building which his status allowed him to do.

 

everything that was coming out of the panthers camp prior to the ray rice video was that they were going to let the legal process play out.  we got caught up in the NFL's scramble for damage control, goodell came down with an ultimatum, and here we are.

Edited by I Mean He Was Found Guilty
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Show your work. And a motorcycle accident doesn't count. Most people who ride will eventually get in an accident. And your uncle's friend who rode for 300 years without an accident isn't a proper sample size

 

 

 

Odd you would bring up bikes and bikers.  I had a brother in law who was a biker.  He died riding a Harley -  he wasnt wearing a helmet.  He didnt live long enough to outgrow the stupidity that he had as a youth.

 

Odds are Hardy wont outgrow his youthful stupidity long enough to make a long term impact in the NFL.  I find it reassuring that the Panthers front office wont take a bet that vegas odd makers wouldnt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why didn't they play him?  because roger goodell would have suspended him without pay if we did.  gettleman was open about the fact that discipline from the panthers wasn't on the table in the joint press conference that he gave with ron rivera after hardy was de-activated against detroit.  the exempt list was a favor to hardy but he pissed all over it by barely showing his face in the building which his status allowed him to do.

 

everything that was coming out of the panthers camp prior to the ray rice video was that they were going to let the legal process play out.  we got caught up in the NFL's scramble for damage control, goodell came down with an ultimatum, and here we are.

 

Well, I could be wrong, but if he was suspended, then we would have saved some money. Here is the closest thing that I could find (so far) that speaks to player suspensions.

 

-First player suspended: No remittance

- Second player suspended: Twenty-five percent of the player's forfeited "paragraph 5" salary up to a maximum of $200,000

-Third player suspended: Thirty-three percent of the player's forfeited "paragraph 5" salary up to a maximum of $350,000

-Fourth player suspended and above: Fifty percent of the player's forfeited "paragraph 5" salary up to a maximum of $500,000

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carolina will be fine without Hardy!! Let the dead horse lie.. Can this be the last damn Hardy thread.. He fug'd up.. the defense was fine without him..its the offense that needed help!! Gee's.. ..I hate the guy now cause of all the damn threads..He is not coming back to Carolina like Peppers, Smith, Gamble, Delhomme, Weinke (coaching St louis).. and probably not Ginn.. why are  people concentrated on re-treads?? if the head wasn't great the first time... probably won't be better the next time!! Move on!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odd you would bring up bikes and bikers.  I had a brother in law who was a biker.  He died riding a Harley -  he wasnt wearing a helmet.  He didnt live long enough to outgrow the stupidity that he had as a youth.

 

Odds are Hardy wont outgrow his youthful stupidity long enough to make a long term impact in the NFL.  I find it reassuring that the Panthers front office wont take a bet that vegas odd makers wouldnt.

 

I would bet that your brother in law didnt die on his own, most likely it was another person on the road that killed him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

very few teams let Pro Bowl players leave ... and the ones that do remain on the bottom, and they cant figure out why.

The team that won the Super Bowl this year traded away a pro bowler at the start of the season.

Likewise, teams like the Steelers have let plenty of big name free agents walk.

If you build well, you can afford to be picky.

The notion that dumping Hardy dooms us to mediocrity is just unfounded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

very few teams let Pro Bowl players leave ... and the ones that do remain on the bottom, and they cant figure out why.

 

and this is the reason we have about the same winning success as the Jags. Its so bad that our fans are conditioned for this and think somehow we are better off without a top 5 DE on the team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it was less Tepper mandating it and more Tepper finally relenting and allowing it. I've always maintained that I think what caused Reich to be fired midseason was likely him going to Tepper and saying something along the lines of "Either let me play Dalton and five this team a chance to compete or just go ahead and fire me now."
    • I honestly think it was a mutual, collective decision. Canales might have been hired to be the Panthers head  coach because he was the best chance to get Bryce where he needed to be to succeed and did everything...I mean he and Morgan did EVERYTHING possible to create a successful situation for Bryce. And it was obvious... painfully obvious that not only was it not working, the team was losing and it was effecting everything. Canales was hired because they thought he could help Bryce, but he was hired as the PANTHERS head coach, not Bryce's personal coach. If everyone could see this was failing far beyond what anyone could have and it didn't look like it was anything that could be fixed quickly....then that everyone who could see would have to include Canales himself who is responsible for not just Bryce, but the whole damn team has to have looked at what it was doing to the team and their chances to win and said, we have to choose what is best for Bryce or the Panthers. He came in and said he had no personal attachment to any player, and that means he has no personal attachment to Bryce. He's going to do what is best to help the team win. If that means benching Bryce, then that's what he's going to do. Did he make this call without Teppers blessing or input? Hell no. Did they come into the Monday meeting having both come to the same conclusion regarding Bryce? I would have a hard time arguing that wasn't the case. All in leadership has to have seen it wasn't just not working...it was killing the team and they had to make this switch for the betterment of the team soon or else lose the season completely. No way would Canales had bern campaigning for Bryce to stay in there. He's not that dumb. Sometimes regardless of the work you do, you have to realize when it's futile and the earlier you recognize it, the better off you will be.
×
×
  • Create New...