Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best QB after Rodgers? Who's #2?


mbarbour21

Recommended Posts

Well according to this article, it's between Brady......and Luck. Wow, I know they have a thing for neck beard.....but wow. Not only do they entertain the fact Luck is better than Brady, but many actually pick Luck as #2 behind Rodgers. That seems very insulting to a four-time Super Bowl Champion......but what do I know?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000474557/article/tom-brady-or-andrew-luck-best-qb-after-mvp-aaron-rodgers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well according to this article, it's between Brady......and Luck. Wow, I know they have a thing for neck beard.....but wow. Not only do they entertain the fact Luck is better than Brady, but many actually pick Luck as #2 behind Rodgers. That seems very insulting to a four-time Super Bowl Champion......but what do I know?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000474557/article/tom-brady-or-andrew-luck-best-qb-after-mvp-aaron-rodgers

Id say either Phillip Rivers or Andrew Luck tbh. I watch a lot of other games throughout the year with sunday tickets shortcuts (it's the whole game but they cut literally everything between plays so the games are 30 mins a piece) They take over games for their teams a lot of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After that performance in the playoffs, they could at least wait for Luck to play another game to redeem himself. It's apparent that they are just marketing Luck to be the face of the league. They don't seem to like the faces that have been coming out the last few years. Like Bridgewater and Winston. So they're just rushing to throne him before the inevitable.

Why would either of them be the face of the league over Luck? One has a 6-6 career record and the other has yet to take a snap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well according to this article, it's between Brady......and Luck. Wow, I know they have a thing for neck beard.....but wow. Not only do they entertain the fact Luck is better than Brady, but many actually pick Luck as #2 behind Rodgers. That seems very insulting to a four-time Super Bowl Champion......but what do I know?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000474557/article/tom-brady-or-andrew-luck-best-qb-after-mvp-aaron-rodgers

 

Better now, Brady, and I may take him over Rodgers for one season.

 

 

To start a franchise, Rodgers, Luck, Rivers, Cam, in that order probably, Rivers is getting long in the tooth, but the dude can play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why the media is not as obsessed about who the best player in the NBA is as it is in fall. hmm!

Oh, Eureka! They can't claim Ricky Rubio is the best.

It couldn't possibly be because the NBA only generates 60% of the revenue of the NFL (and 70% of MLB for that matter) or that the average 2014 NBA Championship series only had 1/3 the TV ratings of the friggin' NFL DRAFT, meaning that far fewer Americans are interested and/or emotionally invested in pro basketball. That couldn't be it at all.

Your schtick is so tired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why the media is not as obsessed about who the best player in the NBA is as it is in fall. hmm!

 

Oh, Eureka! They can't claim Ricky Rubio is the best.

 

 

Err I hear them argue it all the time...? Between Lebro, Rose, Durant, Westbrook etc. Even more so with the GOAT between Jordan, Kobe, Lebron etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of immature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.   
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
    • What the hell?  How is presenting Cam's stats hating him?  The point is not to hate Cam, it is to show you how similar Jones is to him and why you take a look at him.  I mentioned Jones has the skill set to take a look--the response is, "look at his 5 years of performance."  So I compare him to the greatest QB in franchise history, and the stats are similar--while Jones was in a worse situation.  Now that is "hating?"  Come on.  This is a meritless, ignorant, personal attack because you are wrong.  Just stop it.  You all attack the poster when you have nothing.  So saying "we should consider a guy with similar stats and size to Cam Newton" is now hating Cam and making me a Jones super fan- that is just stupid.  
×
×
  • Create New...