Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Meeks...


DevilCat

Recommended Posts

Make the adjustments with what we have on the D line, and count on speed and quickness to stop the run vs. the space occupying ability that Kemo brought. Just in case we do not get what we are looking for as far as a trade or the upcoming cuts. Im just wondering if we game plan this whay would it require too much from our 'backers for run support, and despite our depth at that position would it wear the LBs down over the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, as it stands now, the only choice is to rotate in backup DTs until you find one that has a technique edge over the team we're facing at the moment. In the meantime, the linebackers and safeties are going to wear down very quickly.

I still think moving Brayton over to DT at least gives us a hope. He's got experience on the line and he doesn't move backwards easily.

Or, and this is most likely, we'll work out a trade with either Cleveland or Green Bay for a spare DT/NT type to fill the gap. It'll probably cost us some depth at linebacker or a couple of draft picks next year.

Look, Kemo was handling the job quite well, but there is an answer to fill his rather wide shoes. When we let Jenkins go, Kemo came along; someone else will find a new home here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garcia talked about this on WFNZ with Buckner today. He said that with Kemo out, they NEED to change their scheme (as in, different than they've been doing in the pre-season and different than we've done recently as a team). The question he posed is, would they. And they, of course, being Fox and Meeks. I just don't see it happening. It seems much more possible that they'll stick to what they know and hope the players can step up and meet them.

Buckner mentioned that Meeks is running defense that has been run before and seen before. He's no savior. He isn't (insert coach name who I forget) who brought something new to the table 15-20 years ago. In other words, don't expect miracles.

Lastly, both expressed frustration with the back-ups. Pre-season is their BIG chance to say, "I don't want to ride the bench, I'm that damn good. Put me in." Kemo is done, the backup DTs should be going balls to the wall to get in frint of the other backups and so far they've done next to nothing. And the "it's preseason" retort doesn't work in this case because that's when they fight for a spot.

I'd love to see the scheme changed for what we have on the field. So far it looks a lot like last year. Kemo going down hurts us as we all already know, but in the back of my mind I just feel Foxy will continue to keep things as they are and hope people can meet HIS expectations for what he wants to do.

I'll gladly eat crow if we fly to the ball in droves when the Iggles come to town, but I don't see us being that much more aggressive than we've been so far. I still think we'll make the Playoffs, but I think we're going to get our asses scored on all season long. Meeks will have many a sleepless night ahead of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does he have a choice? No chance for bend but don't break with the thin line.

the db's really have to step and create a ton of turnovers.

Also, the offense playing ball control is the D's other weapon right now.

Haha, Bend But Don't Break, Rucker said that's what we were doing against Miami and I think he said that's what we will do this season.

D-Lo and Stewart are going to have nothing left in the tank at season's end. They'll look good for my Fantasy stats though!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think, under the right circumstances, KC would be the team with the most desperate offer.  Do we want to go from 8 to 31, no, but it would give us 2 extra day 2 picks and a future high pick.  And yes, it would be a huge risk for Morgan.  The only way I see it is the Chiefs added a player at a need position and some day 2 picks and possibly a first in 2026.  Desperate, but the Chiefs are in win now made and their OL was just exposed, which is exactly what the Kendrick Lamar halftime show was about. 
    • He said himself in his interviews today that he is more of a chess piece to move around and mentioned he's been working a lot with Nolan Smith jr.
    • Here is how we move back:  First, Offensive tackle is not good in free agency.  The Draft: The Jets need a LT.  Will Campbell is the consensus best Tackle in the draft, and they take him.  All those other teams (I count 6-8 who need a T--and I see KC STARVING for one after the Super Bowl) decide they need to move up to get the best pure LT in the draft, Kelvin Banks out of Texas.  After Banks and Campbell, there is a pretty sharp drop in talent level, dropping from A players to B players. The next two OTs are Right Tackles, so anyone needing a LT would have to hope the fifth overall OT, Wyatt Milum (arguably) would be there at the end of the first round.  Knowing that so many bidders are doing the same thing and they all have phones, I honestly think that Campbell or Banks is there when the Panthers pick and the phone will be ringing.  If they both go before the Panthers pick, crickets.  Here is the Math: Likely to be gone when Panthers pick: Ward, QB Carter, Edge Sanders, QB Graham, DL Hunter, WR/CB Likely to be available when Panthers pick:  There are 2 picks before the Panthers pick once those five get gone.  Among those are these players: McMillan WR Johnson, CB Will Campbell, OT James Pearce, Edge Javon Walker, Superhero.  If we only had 10 more.  (LB) Kelvin Banks, OT Now, if I am a GM on a team that needs an OT, I feel fairly strong that an OT is not going in the top 5.  I am working on potential trades for the seventh and eighth picks, ready to make a deal as soon as Campbell or Banks goes off the board. The Raiders pick 6th--they have needs at OT, WR, and CB if you assume they sign a QB in free agency; I think Darnold goes there, personally.   Regardless, there are no QBs worth #7 overall (unless Sanders falls), so they will draft an OT or CB--in my view,.  They are going to shop in free agency with a lot of $$$.  I am guessing they get their CB then.  the Raiders' will likely draft OT Campbell, but do not rule out TMac:   Biggest Weaknesses: Quarterback Offensive Tackle Cornerback Wide Receiver Running Back The Jets pick 8th.  Of course, their phone will be ringing off the hook for Banks if this happens, and the Jets have many needs now that Rodgers and Adams are gone.  While they too need an OT, they have more pressing needs as well.  Edge rusher is their biggest need listed here after QB, but their defense was ranked #3 in the NFL last year (I was surprised).  Their offense was ranked 23rd.  They will be focused on revamping the Offense with the losses of Rodgers and Adams.  I see them taking a T or Tmac.  Biggest Weaknesses: Quarterback Edge-Rusher Wide Receiver Safety Interior Defensive Line Offensive Tackle In this scenario, the only ways the Panthers can trade back is: 1. If the Raiders do not take an OT and the Jets do. 2. If the Jets refuse trade offers and take the best available edge or WR at #7. 3. Both OTs are gone and a team wants the best CB or WR in the draft and is willing trade up.  I do not see a lot of depth in this draft at CB or #1 WR.  What may cause the Panthers to stay put and pick:  1. Edge.  They see Pearce or Green as part of the second-tier edges and need one of them. 2. They like TMac and see the offense taking the next step with him, knowing they can address IDL in round 2 and have Clowney and Wonnum for another season.  3.  The do not re-sign Mike Jax and need an outside CB and have the chance to draft Johnson to pair with Horn.  4.  They fall in love with Walker and Evero develops a boner on how to use him properly.  From this perspective, I would give the chance of trade back slightly under 50% I would speculate that if we draft, we take Pearce, Johnson, or McMillan.  I do not see Walker being a good fit here, but I understand why some of you like him.
×
×
  • Create New...