Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bill Voth's chat with Gettleman Part 3: On the offense


Nick_81

Recommended Posts

Thanks for sharing man.

I believe Gettleman when he says that we'll get there. 45-7 panther wins are in our future. Just gotta get the personell in now.

We are literally building our team just like the seahawks imo. Except we will be tougher and stronger at the point of attack on both lines and we have a QB who can do much more and put the team on his back and carry us.

I feel like we are 40% the way there as far as personell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just what I have been telling everyone that constantly criticizes Shula.  Shula runs the system that both Gettleman and Rivera want.  When he has the players to run his system, he can be successful.  When he doesnt we struggle.  For those on Shula's nuts about poor playcalling, consider being an Eagle's fan or a Saint's fan.  Because as long as Gettleman is here, our current offense is the kind of offense you can expect.

 

Sits back while the bitching and whining continues despite the fact that Gettleman said it isn't going to change and the goal is to give Shula and Cam more weapons to work,not making changes to the system or philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remmers got beat like a drum against the Seahawks.

 

I'll give him props for coming in and doing better than Chandler, but we shouldn't be completely content like our RT problem is solved.  I hope Remmers can be the guy, but I'd keep options open.

 

Lots of RT's got beat like a drum by Seattle.  He aint dancing to canton, but he should be able to keep Cam upright.  We have to make Cam comfortable that his blind side isnt gonna get him killed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...