Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's talk about Fozzy...


TheNewStandard

Recommended Posts

Like another poster said, Fozzy is a good change of pace back. He provides solid depth, but will most likely always be a #2 or #3 back. I just don't see him ever being a full-time starter. With that being said, we will most definitely draft a runningback in this year's draft. We would be stupid not to, considering how deep the RB's are this year. If we can pick up an OT in the FA, then we might take a DE in the first, and since receivers are also deep this year, we could grab a RB in the 2nd ONLY if Gurley is still there. If not, then I wouldn't mind taking Tevin Coleman in the 3rd or Mike Davis. But Gurley is without a doubt the most NFL ready back. When he's back to 100%, watch out. I think it makes sense for us to take him, with Stew, Fozzy, and Reaves and maybe an UDFA RB on the depth chart, Gurley can take it slow and try and contribute later on in the season.

Only the NFL put 7+ in the box. Most +premiered collegiate running backs are going up against zone passi g defenses with open space to gain yards.

Finding rbs that are actual rbs are rare and coveted...not a dime a dozen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fozzy's only 25.

 

He'll be 26 in 2 weeks. He won't be starting this year and likely not the year after, and typically RBs start to decline at 28. So he's not the option after Stew. I definitely want to keep him as our change of pace behind Stew, but he's not going to be our starter after Stew, IMO. Would be solid the next few years if Stew has injuries, but this year showed that we really don't have much depth at RB. Fozzy has been plagued by injuries like Stew has, D-Will is gone and was trash, Tolbert has kind of sucked and don't get me started on Reeves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'll be 26 in 2 weeks. He won't be starting this year and likely not the year after, and typically RBs start to decline at 28. So he's not the option after Stew. I definitely want to keep him as our change of pace behind Stew, but he's not going to be our starter after Stew, IMO. Would be solid the next few years if Stew has injuries, but this year showed that we really don't have much depth at RB. Fozzy has been plagued by injuries like Stew has, D-Will is gone and was trash, Tolbert has kind of sucked and don't get me started on Reeves.

 

Yeah good point. I don't really think anyone wants him to start per se anyways, just get lots of Sproles type touches. Until we can find someone better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fozzy is a good backup but i look for Dave Gettleman to draft another RB in the latter rds,as well as get at least one UDFA RB.

Why draft a secondary rusher when we have Whitaker? Whitaker is solid and we paid Stewart for two or three more seasons to bs tgs feature back?

I'm among tgs group that thinks we can get a RB off the street if need be as long as he is in shape and runs north and south.

Stewart, Cam +whoever the heck you want to throw pig there is solid.

Heck, half our fan base is in emotional distress about our RB salary base...

If you can run the ball and hold onto it, you are an asset to the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...