Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

leinhart - "every qb tampers with the ball, except one"


Recommended Posts

Two things wrong in this post. The Indy balls haven't been tested according to anyone, so we don't know if they were deflated or not 2 days later. Secondly, it's not just the ref's job to inspect pre game and at the half. It's their job to not put balls in the field of play that don't qualify. It's in the rule book. They have to get a ball from the opposing team if a team's balls don't meet specifications.

All balls are weighed twice before each game. Something happened after they were weighed. In other words, the balls DID qualify at the beginning of the game. Once they were altered, it's their job to ensure the ball is within regulation, hence, the reweighing. What is it exactly you dont understand?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some are saying stupid stuff like "Everybody cheats." That is what the cheaters say, anyway.  In the NFL, there is cheating on nearly every play, but if caught, there are consequences.  This is the second instance of cheating under BB that has been exposed.  To me, that is as bad as Payton in New Orleans and Bountygate.  I think BB should be suspended for a year. 

 

Tp those who say, "They would have won anyway."  In most cases, the outcome of a football game can be reduced to about 3-4 plays. And unless you are psychic, you do not know how the game would have turned out. For example, if my WR catches a ball that he would have dropped on one play of a 13-play drive, and that is the ONLY play that was impacted, then it could be the difference between a punt and a TD.  If it happens twice in a game, ONLY TWICE, That is more points than the biggest spreads in Vegas.   it not only could impact the score, but the other team's play calling.  When this was discovered the score was 17-7.  Ten points.  That is enough to change Indy's complete strategy in the second half.  They had to be more aggressive in bad weather than New England, who could run the ball, and they did.  Result?  Blowout.

 

To those who say, :"I don't see what the big deal is." You are either saying that you cannot understand how slight advantages can tip the scale or you are saying that you have a nearly non-existent personal code of ethics.  Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When rulles are knowingly and willingly broken by a team to obtain an unfair advantage,one that could effect the outcome of a game,that offending team should have a high draft choice taken, or a salary cap reduction,especially a team that has been caught cheating in the past.

 

These NFL teams make so much money that fining them a sum of money is not as much of a wake up call as a draft choice hit ,or salary cap reduction, Hit the offending  team in an area that hurts and not only will it get their attention but other teams that might have ideas of breaking rules that would favor them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually if you go by what Rodgers said.....he doesn't admit to that. He advised he liked to see what the refs would do. Which could imply they went for standard inspection and played with what the refs deemed okay.

He never said he altered it. He said he liked them overinflated and push the limits.... would want to see if the refs took some out. If the refs deem it okay it is

Rodgers acknowleged the refs ability to inspect.....didn't claim to alter what the refs gave them back to play with (which is what NE is guilty of)

 

What he also said was that the balls are checked indoors out of any weather elements that could affect the balls in play and he feels that should change. Said the balls always change on their own once they are outside. But that change would happen for both teams unless one team stores them differently, as an example, in heated air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two things wrong in this post. The Indy balls haven't been tested according to anyone, so we don't know if they were deflated or not 2 days later. Secondly, it's not just the ref's job to inspect pre game and at the half. It's their job to not put balls in the field of play that don't qualify. It's in the rule book. They have to get a ball from the opposing team if a team's balls don't meet specifications.

 

Lol and what are the refs supposed to do? Take a 20 second timeout between every play to stick a needle in the ball and check the PSI?

 

Real simple concept here... the refs inspected the balls pre-game, gave them back to the Patriots, the Patriots then took air out of the balls. How is that hard to understand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...