Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It is great how


Bozarden

Recommended Posts

Seattle has completely disowned the saying that you need a great QB to win. They have a great team, who kept together all game, despite of their offense falling apart repeatedly and in the end they capitalized on Green Bay who refused to put the game away. Wilson made some good plays to win the game in the end, but played an absolutely terrible game all in all, so please stop talking about how he should be in the hall of fame, when reality the entire Seattle team should go down in history as one of the most well put together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did Seattle make a deal with God or something? Luckiest team ever. I kid you not, RIGHT before they kicked that onside kick, I said to my homies they were going to get it. I said they were going to win the coin toss in OT too. Wilson can just throw up ANYTHING and somehow the receivers comes down with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, that 2 pt conversion wasn't luck.

 

Pure skill. If you can't see that then you are a homer.

 

Wilson knew exactly what he was doing when he looked the other way,  closed his eyes and tossed the ball 100 yards straight up in the air.  He knew that 5 Packer defenders would miss it,  as it floated between all of them..  and he knew that his guy would bring it down.     Just pure skiill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...