Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Old Rare NES game selling for $40k on eBay


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

https://www.yahoo.com/games/news/bidding-super-rare-nes-game-194600895.html

I've found this interesting because I actually remember playing this game when I was 5-6 at a friends house.

I used to trade games in a while back but have discovered that I usually end up regretting it later so I've stopped trading in now. Still have all my old N64 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This makes me want to cry.  I had this too.

 

 

I had this game. HAD. I'm jumping off a bridge now....

 

only 200 copies of stadium events actually made it to stores and most of those were eventually recalled which is why it's so ridiculously rare and valuable.  both of you are probably thinking of world class track meet which is what that game was rebranded as and is way more common.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

basically there were barely any copies of the game manufactured, even fewer shipped, and even fewer still purchased out of the pool of 200 that actually made it to stores.  the unsold copies got yanked because nintendo bought the rights to the game and the accessories from bandai and repackaged them.  that game got a much wider release because it was published by nintendo and was a pack-in game for the NES combo package that came with the power pad.  i was friends with probably three or four kids who had that version.  there are copies of the reissue going for $.01 on amazon.com right now so unfortunately the collectors' market for that game isn't nearly as good.

 

it goes like that for a lot of things though.  weird one off version of something that got almost no distribution and is factory sealed = valuable as hell usually

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...