Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Running Backs by the Numbers

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted

we can find other lead blockers who are just as good at a fraction of the price. He doesnt add much to the running game anymore. He isnt even that good at lead blocking. Hes just a big fat running back imo

Oh Huddler, Huddler, Huddler. You could not be more wrong my friend. lol

Now, I will admit that he has had a rather disappointing season. But...he has had both shoulder and chest injuries. Add in our O-line problems for most of the year, and it is easy for me to give him a break for this year.

First. Replacing him with a cheaper version is only going to hurt the team long term. Very few players are as versatile as Tolbert. Sure you can save some money, but you are going to get a lesser player for that money.

Second. When healthy, he is a hellofa player. And an important piece of the puzzle. That is all.

Lastly. Do you even watch the games? I always wanted to say that. May not be apropos for this discussion, but, I just felt the need to throw it in there. Nothing personal. Just trying to be semi-funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nosuchthingasapanther Explorer

nosuchthingasapanther

Posted
Posted

How does keeping Stewy make Tolbert redundant? Tolbert does more lead blocking than actual running anymore. Whereas Stewy does no lead blocking. Tolbert is our only FB. Unless we bring in a FB that can replace him, Tolbert is probably going to be here again next year.

Also, Tolbert can fill in at RB if needed. And actually has great hands out of the backfield. Throw in that he is relatively cheap, and I can see him hanging around for at least the foreseeable future.

Then again, we don't use a FB all that often. But...IMO, Tolbert is a pretty valuable piece of the puzzle.

Stewy, Tolbert, and Fozzy would work for me for at least one more year.

 

tolbert does very little run blocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted

tolbert does very little run blocking.

He does a poo ton more blocking than running. The problem was/is his health. He was dinged up most of the year. Add in our O-line problems, and it appears as though our whole backfield was poo.

Sure we can get a better lead blocker than Tolbert. But...chances are, that guy won't be nearly as versatile as Tolbert. Tolbert does way more, when healthy, than just lead block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted

How does keeping Stewy make Tolbert redundant? Tolbert does more lead blocking than actual running anymore. Whereas Stewy does no lead blocking. Tolbert is our only FB. Unless we bring in a FB that can replace him, Tolbert is probably going to be here again next year.

Also, Tolbert can fill in at RB if needed. And actually has great hands out of the backfield. Throw in that he is relatively cheap, and I can see him hanging around for at least the foreseeable future.

Then again, we don't use a FB all that often. But...IMO, Tolbert is a pretty valuable piece of the puzzle.

Stewy, Tolbert, and Fozzy would work for me for at least one more year.

 

based on price, i mean. but i'm ok with the three of them once we're off the books for deangelo. we've seen what good offensive line play and a healthy stew can do for the running attack… it yields benefits for everyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Huddler Veteran

The Huddler

Posted
Posted

Oh Huddler, Huddler, Huddler. You could not be more wrong my friend. lol

Now, I will admit that he has had a rather disappointing season. But...he has had both shoulder and chest injuries. Add in our O-line problems for most of the year, and it is easy for me to give him a break for this year.

First. Replacing him with a cheaper version is only going to hurt the team long term. Very few players are as versatile as Tolbert. Sure you can save some money, but you are going to get a lesser player for that money.

Second. When healthy, he is a hellofa player. And an important piece of the puzzle. That is all.

Lastly. Do you even watch the games? I always wanted to say that. May not be apropos for this discussion, but, I just felt the need to throw it in there. Nothing personal. Just trying to be semi-funny.

I do watch games my friend! i may be drunk on my ass but i watch for sure!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Oh Huddler, Huddler, Huddler. You could not be more wrong my friend. lol

Now, I will admit that he has had a rather disappointing season. But...he has had both shoulder and chest injuries. Add in our O-line problems for most of the year, and it is easy for me to give him a break for this year.

First. Replacing him with a cheaper version is only going to hurt the team long term. Very few players are as versatile as Tolbert. Sure you can save some money, but you are going to get a lesser player for that money.

Second. When healthy, he is a hellofa player. And an important piece of the puzzle. That is all.

Lastly. Do you even watch the games? I always wanted to say that. May not be apropos for this discussion, but, I just felt the need to throw it in there. Nothing personal. Just trying to be semi-funny.

He will be a 30 yr old RB next year....Tolbert is at the end.

And Tolbert looked like poo this year if you watched him before the injury. He is old. Generally speaking when discussing 30 yr old RBs......the "future" is mainly just referencing the past....bc there is no future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted

Oh Huddler, Huddler, Huddler. You could not be more wrong my friend. lol

Now, I will admit that he has had a rather disappointing season. But...he has had both shoulder and chest injuries. Add in our O-line problems for most of the year, and it is easy for me to give him a break for this year.

First. Replacing him with a cheaper version is only going to hurt the team long term. Very few players are as versatile as Tolbert. Sure you can save some money, but you are going to get a lesser player for that money.

Second. When healthy, he is a hellofa player. And an important piece of the puzzle. That is all.

Lastly. Do you even watch the games? I always wanted to say that. May not be apropos for this discussion, but, I just felt the need to throw it in there. Nothing personal. Just trying to be semi-funny.

 

Maybe a cheaper replacement would be a bit of a drop off but the money saved might help us get a better tackle.  Would that be worth it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

yeah we need Cam leading the team in rushing once again.bad idea.

Yeah, you don't need a first round RB......for Cam not to lead the team in rushing. Just need an a good team around Cam. Need to get away from the illusion that a run game begins with a RB. A it begins with an OL.....and helps even more with a legit pass attack. Have that....and anyone can run. Proof can be seen on Sundays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • chbright
      Keeping it real about Bryce Young. Listen to those who actually watched film.

      By chbright · Posted

      All these ex-players coming out and showing how bad Bryce has been came after our announcement. The announcement Monday opened the door to let them say it without getting the brand that is the NFL to lash out. They don't want a #1 to fail, quite the opposite. Its drama, but not in a good way. For the NFL Bryce getting benched is not a good look, just like his play. Lets think on the timeline here in 2024 The video evidence was there last year. Internally, they got a good chance to review it throughout the season and really well after it ended. Upon review, out goes Fitt cause the NFL tape and the evaluation didn't match up.  Morgan must have done one hell of a not my guy sales pitch or at least explained learning from it very damn well and what the next QB may look like if Bryce didn't improve. 0% chance the coaches, Tepper, Morgan, exc went into 2024 without starting to plan the next steps if Bryce didn't correct his course and some big strides in 2024. It's bad business to just stick to a bad stock or employee without an out, even when you like the stock or employee. Performance trumps all. They had to start at least a framework of what to do if Bryce did not improve base on the gap between expectations and output in 2023. And they did things internally to help evaluate the offense as a whole before just a straight 1 and done season from Bryce. They improved the cast with proven commodities to see where gaps were. Externally others had time to look over the 2023 film in depth. Analysts, reporters worth a damn, other players, and want to be football nerds had some tough pills to swallow if they took a stance that Young was the right guy coming into the 2023 draft. A lot took steps back from the stance he was a super processor guy that can overcome physical shortcomings. They had another target to ease their miss from the 2022-2023 draft cycle: Tepper. Damn well they should for this mess and so much more before 2023. But Bryce's NFL flaws were shown, and the team made the exact effort the masses claimed was the real problem: supporting cast needed upgrades. And guess what, Morgan did that. A proven OG pair, another proven WR (so 2 legit WRs, even though Chark was a legit deep threat too), heavy O draft. Brought in Canales for a guy that has promise as an offensive mind to help out. Think this is part of a larger plan to get all the parts of the offense together while the QB is cheap to evaluate the QB and start over if required so the next years have good support for any QB. They did not use Fitts vision of the QB lifting meh into greatness.  Then you have game 1 against the Saints to start 2024. Arguably one of Bryce's worst games out of his 1st 17 games kicked off the year. The upper management's fears were on display and that offseason backup plan was squarely on the table to find a new QB. I'd speculate they had a meeting the following days to start talking about what triggers moving on. Coming off the heels of a really bad 2023, and an offseason where he needed to take a mental break for a sec and catch some Netflix. Yeah that's not a bad idea for a guy that's been through the grind and needs a wee bit of time to unwind. The issue is we are not talking about a vet here or someone that just had a bad year after a few years in. We are talking about a guy who didn't process the game at the right speed all last year taking a break...... The bad performances last year coupled with the offseason broke folks. Dante and Thielen are workaholics. They are not the Randy Moss type that it comes natural to. Thielen isn't some physical freak and Dante is a gym rat to get there. Others mentioned body language of other players from 2023 and 2024 practice. I think the locker room had enough DURING game 1. A guy that didn't have it last year, didn't go 100% in through the last game till game 1 of 2024 really would rub those type of players the wrong way and start escalating from soft whispers in 2023 to visible and vocal signs in 2024. Enter game 2, which was the worse of his 18-game career. There was not time to watch the Chargers film and change Canales' mind from the Sunday post-game comments. I think it was more likely a sit down of the front-line leaders (coaches) with the executive team (Morgan and Co) with the CEO (Tepper) and they all agreed to start the process of evaluating the team and start filling the QB role with someone other than Young. Due to the way the NFL works, Bryce isn't out like a typical employee, but it would take one hell of a turnaround for him to stick here long term. 2nd they had the rest of the locker room to contend with. Continuing to let Young out there was pretty much hurting both sides getting later pay checks due to the bad results which was perceived as bad players (something they heard to round out 2023). Alos you have a staff that cannot police bad play as the #1 overall why should the rest give 110%/ make the business decision to stay healthy while collecting checks. Now if they see signs of growth in practice in all forms from Bryce, he can come back and win back a locker room. Right now the tone suggest relief that its not Bryce as QB (ouch). Then you have the big bandwagon of Chase Daniels, Kurt Warner and the like agree with this move from the team on Monday. They saw it possible in review of 2023 and the reports from Bryce, players going on during the offseason and camp. They saw the gaps that were there from 2023 tape, so seeing it again and worse made it easy for that bunch to really lay into why we did this Monday. Crazy Steve A is always going to take a hot take that stirs the drama pot because it gets eyes and talk which equals $$$$$. Others follow that stick too. That group have a correct take on Tepper' failures and issues, but Bryce's failures are also true and they need to admit that too. As for Bryce getting blindsided by this, I can buy a part of it, but one part cannot be left alone. No way the issues we continue to see are never told to him and nothing is going on to help. In no way could a regular employee think if the performance to expectation gap continued to be so large that nothing was going to happen. 18 games almost all well below expectation and needs. So there was a reconning on the horizon and here we are, Bryce should have expected something based on so many bad performances and 2 of the worst this year and the feedback. Now the part I believe. He didn't have a seat in the all-hands call Monday morning, his level doesn't get in that meeting. Also, you generally don't tell a new guy, hey we are looking at firing/benching you this early (AKA preseason here). So I can buy he was told closer to the press conference on Monday, and they didn't tell him earlier as the all hands call with the coaches on up sealed the deal Monday morning.
    • strato
      At this point in time, who feels like we lost this trade?

      By strato · Posted

      There are people in here right now that still, after all we have seen, have refused to accept any narrative that doesn’t have Bryce as the victim. You can’t fight that without getting worn out     it was speculation until NFL games are in the books, because the people who will not accept what you are trying to tell them, can say you can’t prove that.  Peyton had a horrible rookie year, never Jamarcus Russell had a horrible rookie year.  Until Bryce throws his first NFL INT I couldn’t prove to some people that he was capable of throwing one. 
    • UAPanther
      Drinking in Vegas. Won $1600 on Panthers slot machine. Gonna drop it all on Panthers outright win at closest sportsbook. Come at me.

      By UAPanther · Posted

      Section 107 representing btw. Let’s get that W 💙🖤💙
×
×
  • Create New...