Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets Losing Fans because of T-Shirts


CarolinaPanthers8789

Recommended Posts

I have no problem with it personally. I don't care if players do this type of stuff.

However, it is against NBA regulations. They are breaking rules set by their employer (NBA) and agreed to by their representation (Player's Association) and are subject to a fine. The NBA shouldn't bend rules and pick and choose what they allow to slide and deem okay even though it's against rules. It's no different than the NFL making crap up as they go with the DV issue.

If a player wore an Athiest, Christianity, Islamic, Gay Pride, Pro-Choice, Pro-Gun, etc. t-shirt a much large number of fans from one political side or another would be completely outraged a million times more than the few people upset by the "I can't breathe" t-shirts. Not only that, the NBA would immediately fine and possibly suspend the player for simply expressing his beliefs and voicing his opinion on a social/political issue. Now the NBA has opened themselves up to legal repercussions and a lawsuit for discrimination. You can't pick and choose who gets to express themselves. The NBA should've nipped this in the very beginning. If players want to voice their opinion on social media or go to rallies, etc that's fine. But all the political & social stuff needs to stay separate from the game itself.

That's the only point I was making. Because a lot of people are crying that anyone upset with the shirts is a racist old white guy. That's ridiculous. It has nothing to do with race with 99% of those upset, people just don't want political/social issues mixed into sports.

This is different from religion or politics. This is a social issue and people for years crap on MJ and Tiger for not having a opinion. Now people have a problem with players being socially aware. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious on y'all's opinion, but what do you think the point of the shirts are.

- to raise awareness against police brutality

- to shed light on racism

- a combination of the two

 

i think it's neither.

 

The point is to weaken the ability of the police to enforce the law.  Police officers have the right to arrest those suspected of committing crime. Citizens do not have a right to resist lawful arrest. When you do resist an arrest that forces the cop to use force. Force is violence and it's ugly. There will be injuries and even fatalities when violence is involved.

 

If people have different solutions that are effective I'd like to hear them. There is no peaceful way to arrest a resisting person.

 

People have died from tasers, gunshots (obviousy), and the public has complained about batons (recently there's a video of a black cop hitting a black youth on a train with a baton in the head and he bleeds severely - not in the news often mysteriously).

 

Is there a safe tranquilizer to use on these people?

 

I've heard no real alternatives. So I can only assume they won't the police removed from certain communities creating lawless zones around America. As Barkley said, they want the wild wild west.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ehh. I think the shirts are stoopid stoopid but any fans that bails on the hornets because of this and not their shitacular play probably isn't much of a fan anyways.

 

Exactly. They already thought most NBA players were "thugs" anyway. The whole "rap" culture. And this team is owned by a black guy whose "black" players are wearing those shirts?

 

No way they can support this team anymore. Makes them feel too "uncomfortable." The world revolves around their feelings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think it's neither.

The point is to weaken the ability of the police to enforce the law. Police officers have the right to arrest those suspected of committing crime. Citizens do not have a right to resist lawful arrest. When you do resist an arrest that forces the cop to use force. Force is violence and it's ugly. There will be injuries and even fatalities when violence is involved.

If people have different solutions that are effective I'd like to hear them. There is no peaceful way to arrest a resisting person.

People have died from tasers, gunshots (obviousy), and the public has complained about batons (recently there's a video of a black cop hitting a black youth on a train with a baton in the head and he bleeds severely - not in the news often mysteriously).

Is there a safe tranquilizer to use on these people?

I've heard no real alternatives. So I can only assume they won't the police removed from certain communities creating lawless zones around America. As Barkley said, they want the wild wild west.

Are you fuging kidding me??

Dude shoots up a movie theater military style dressed as the Joker and he is taking ALIVE!!

4 cops can't subdue a unarmed man without killing him..

And to step into reality for a second this isn't the only time young black men have been killed by officers. We are now approaching 30 in the last 2 years. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the type of post I didn't want to see...

No need to race bait or bring any sort of ethnicity into the thread.

"Insecure people need to get over themselves" would have sufficed just fine.

 

Give it a rest, dude. The people complaining ARE WHITE.

 

That is a fact, therefore, it was stated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you fuging kidding me??

Dude shoots up a movie theater military style dressed as the Joker and he is taking ALIVE!!

4 cops can't subdue a unarmed man without killing him..

And to step into reality for a second this isn't the only time young black men have been killed by officers. We are now approaching 30 in the last 2 years. .

 

WHITE DUDE shoots up a movie theater...and he is taken "alive."

4 cops can't subdue an unarmed BLACK man without killing.

 

Those are the facts. The variable is "race." Those who ignore the racial aspect think their "comfort" matters more than facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give it a rest, dude. The people complaining ARE WHITE.

That is a fact, therefore, it was stated.

What does that have to do with anything?

You're pointing that out is just as racist as people saying that Garner deserved to be killed. Racism knows no color, as soon as you understand that the sooner life will be for you.

Take a look in the mirror before making stupid posts and comments like that or I'll make sure you can't post in this thread anymore.

Quit grouping people and drop the racism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does that have to do with anything?

You're pointing that out is just as racist as racist as people saying that Garner deserved to be killed.

Take a look in the mirror before making stupid posts and comments like that or I'll make sure you can't post in this thread anymore.

Quit grouping people and drop the racism.

 

Facts = facts.

 

Facts DO NOT EQUAL race.

 

If "race" is a fact, the facts are still the facts.

 

The people complaining are white.

The players wearing the shirts are black.

The players are wearing the shirt because of black men who were killed.

 

If race can't be brought up on topics where it is a factor, then lock these threads before they get started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does that have to do with anything?

You're pointing that out is just as racist as people saying that Garner deserved to be killed. Racism knows no color, as soon as you understand that the sooner life will be for you.

Take a look in the mirror before making stupid posts and comments like that or I'll make sure you can't post in this thread anymore.

Quit grouping people and drop the racism.

You don't think none of this has to do with race??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tetairoa McMillan.   The last 28 1st overall picks were either a QB, DE, or OT. Seeing as I don't think we'd take an OT in the 1st and give up on Ickey as an LT yet and there doesn't seem to be a clear overall #1 type of QB or DE pick this year, it very well could be a non conventional #1 overall this year, at least in regards from the last almost 3 decades of drafts. If we didn't have Horn, I'd be more open to Hunter as a CB at #1, but we have him so another CB wouldn't be how I'd use a #1 pick.  And as much as I love Legette, if we have SB contending aspirations, I don't think Legette is a #1 on a team like that, but he damn sure is an elite #2 on a team like that.  He's more of the Smith/Higgins/Waddle to Brown/Chase/Hill (in terms of role/impact, not style of play of course). T-Mac is going to be the top ranked WR on every team's board in the end.  He is going to be a true outside #1 WR who is viewed as a consensus Top 5 WR in the game by his second contract in the same way guys like Jefferson and Chase have done.  His height combined with his speed, athleticism, and hands are near impossible to find all in one player, there is a reason his generally used comp is Mike Evans (although as he's not as thick, I personally see him more as an AJ Green). Yes, as an Arizona alum I've admitted to having bias towards the player to begin with.  But he's also someone very widely being put into the Top 5 in mock drafts lately and most of them have him as the first non QB offensive player being taken, so it's not really THAT much of a homer pick on my part anyways. If a QB or DE truly separate themselves as being a can't miss prospect come draft day, I'm open to that discussion, but until then, or if it doesn't happen, T-Mac is my pick 100 times out of 100.
    • Logjam, indeed! Makes me nervous.
×
×
  • Create New...