Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting note on check plays


Gucci Mane

Recommended Posts

Last week we learned that Cam is able to check out of about 30% of plays that shula runs. This morning on Mike and Mike, they were talking about the whole Jay Cutler thing and Cris Carter estimated that in any given offense there is probably a check on at least 80% of the plays. Just another tidbit to add to the laundry list of reasons why the shuster is inept at developing an offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last week we learned that Cam is able to check out of about 30% of plays that shula runs. This morning on Mike and Mike, they were talking about the whole Jay Cutler thing and Cris Carter estimated that in any given offense there is probably a check on at least 80% of the plays. Just another tidbit to add to the laundry list of reasons why the shuster is inept at developing an offense.

Are we talking a checkdown or an audible? Are we talking calling a different play or a check between Cam and the receiver based on how the defense is lined up.

Additionally some plays like a read option has several options depending on what the defense is doing so there is not an audible needed.

If it any consolation, Shula lets Newton do more than Chud did if I remember the conversation from 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Throught the history of the Huddle no other topic unites Huddlers like the topic of hating the offensive coordinator lol.

Chud was the only one I liked and most the huddle wanted him dead.

 

 

Year one Chud was a genius

 

Year two he got too cute and went full retard the first half of the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Throught the history of the Huddle no other topic unites Huddlers like the topic of hating the offensive coordinator lol.

Chud was the only one I liked and most the huddle wanted him dead.

 

Gil Haskell was also a great OC for the Panthers way back in 1999.

 

His O scored 421 points (26.3/g), ranking the Panthers 4th of 31 in the NFL. 

 

Exciting best describes that year's offense (a word rarely used for this team's O). Unfortunately, Gil was only here one year and the defense allowed about as many points as the offense scored.

 

Likely explains the team's final record of 8-8.

It was an exiting year right down to the last game fighting for our playoff lives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gil Haskell was also a great OC for the Panthers way back in 1999.

His O scored 421 points (26.3/g), ranking the Panthers 4th of 31 in the NFL.

Exciting best describes that year's offense (a word rarely used for this team's O). Unfortunately, Gil was only here one year and the defense allowed about as many points as the offense scored.

Likely explains the team's final record of 8-8.

It was an exiting year right down to the last game fighting for our playoff lives.

While I am sure Gil deserves some credit, the majority goes to Steve Bueerlein who had a great year and was tough as nails. If I remember correctly that offensive line allowed 50 sacks and the running game sucked. . And let's not forget Wesley Walls, Patrick Jeffers, and Moose who had over 1200 yards. We couldn't run the ball so Steve aired it out back before the rules favored the offense so much. He had 36 TDs and 4400 yards on 576 attempts. Completed 60%. I think the 4400 is a franchise record for passing yards.

A lots of coordinators could have worked with that. Getting rid of Beuerlein led to Seiferts downfall and not until jake had his big year in 2005 did we come close to scoring that many again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have nothing against Mike Evans, it's that he keeps saying it's ridiculous for me to think T-Mac will be a better player than Evans, based on Evans totality of his career statistical output. They're not the same thing, at all.  Basically what he's arguing is that it would be insane for someone to say any RB coming into the league is going to be better than Frank Gore.  There are going to be LOTS of RBs over the years who are better than Gore but will never make the HOF.   Or how about comparing a QB to Rivers or Eli?  There are going to be a lot of QBs that you'd predict will be better, and for a period of time will be, but they won't be able to do it long enough to have the same career as those guys. Longevity of great play does not equal an elite player, it equals an elite career.  If you're building a team for one season, health aside and looking at peak performance, there are way too many WRs over the last decade that I'd take over Evans to consider him a true elite WR in my mind. For example, I looked it up, here is where he has finished every season ranked in Receptions and Yards 2014 - 36th in Rec and 19th in Yds 2015 - 30 and 11 2016 - 6 and 4 2017 - 23 and 15 2018 - 17 and 3 2019 - 36 and 13 2020 - 32 and 18 2021 - 28 and 22 2022 - 25 and 13 2023 - 24 and 9 2024 - 28 and 23 He's played 11 seasons, only twice finished higher than 23rd in receptions and 3 times in the Top 10 in yards, 5 of the 11 outside the Top 15. He had a great CAREER, but outside of 2016 and 2018, he really wasn't ever an elite WR outside of being an elite red zone threat.
    • I’m not sure what Mike Evans did to offend you but if we draft a WR at 8 that is Mike Evans I think everyone in Carolina would be ecstatic 
×
×
  • Create New...