Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What would the perception be if it was Hardy who wrecked?


Ruff

Recommended Posts

who knows. what is it you want to accomplish with this? cause/blame is still under investigation. Are you trying to imply cam would be innocent because hes cam and hardy would be guilty because he has another court case. I dunno seems silly.

If this was Hardy, we would somehow be blaming it on him. We're all guilty of assuming Hardy is doing the worst thing possible, and something like this (or the report like the one came out today that Cam has 16 traffic violations in 7 years) would be another strike against his long term value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who the hell cares? why are we comparing Cam Newton and Greg Hardy, and I am probably the biggest Hardy supporter on this board. just be grateful that Cam walked out of this alive and the other driver from all accounts escaped serious injury. this is not a time to bring up the negative and try to prove points. thank god everyone is ok. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this was Hardy, we would somehow be blaming it on him. We're all guilty of assuming Hardy is doing the worst thing possible, and something like this (or the report like the one came out today that Cam has 16 traffic violations in 7 years) would be another strike against his long term value.

 

disagree completly.  as like I said the accident is still under investigation, now if you are saying you would assume Hardy was guilty, thats on you, but dont assume every one thinks the same way.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...