Cam was hit from the back according to eyewitness - Video

[CelibatePimp]

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-around-the-nfl/0ap3000000441507/Eyewitness-reports-from-Newton-s-accident

 

Dude said he was driving behind Cam and was first on the scene. Said their light turned green and out of nowhere this buick came from the left side, nailing the back end of the driver's side of Newton's truck sending his car skidding and flipping. If it turns out the other person run a stop sign, he may feel the full extent of the law considering what just happened.

[CelibatePimp]

Another video from the scene.

 

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-around-the-nfl/0ap3000000441503/Darlington-Cam-Newton-is-in-fair-condition

[RoaringRiot]

The car's right side was damaged. Seems like it would be the left if he hit him in the back.

[CelibatePimp]

The car's right side was damaged. Seems like it would be the left if he hit him in the back.

 

Was thinking the same thing but then I thought it was possible the dude was trying to swerve and served Newton with his right side.

[GRWatcher]

We won't know until the accident reconstruction is done & reported. But that she pulled out into traffic is telling in itself.

[Jon Snow]

The car's right side was damaged. Seems like it would be the left if he hit him in the back.

From what I saw from the on scene videos reporting from the intersection Newton was struck by the other vehicle which was approaching at any angle, sort a less skewed y intersection, from Newtons left side. From that angle the damage would be to the right side of the vehicle that struck Cam's truck.

[beastson]

Kind of confusing here

[Jon Snow]

Also the impact would be the right front of the automobile and most likely the left rear tire in Cam's truck as it's raised and has larger tires. Also would make it easier to flip. That also was the reason it probably stayed on the bridge instead of skidding out of control.

[KillerKat]

Yet The Charlotte Observer says it was Cam's fault. fuging morons.

[Cary Kollins]

Yet The Charlotte Observer says it was Cam's fault. fuging morons.

Did they really? Do you have a quote because I would like to read it.

[KillerKat]

Did they really? Do you have a quote because I would like to read it.

Well nvm. Idk if chknwing quoted the wrong article or the website changed it. Nothing what he said was in the article.

charlotte observer is reporting Cam was at fault in the accident

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/12/09/5373415/cam-newton-hurt-in-uptown-wreck.html#.VIdqenvzJ8E

The Buick’s unidentified driver, writhing in pain on the sidewalk, told police that he was crossing Church Street when a truck “came flying down” the street and struck him.

Construction workers who wouldn’t identify themselves told an Observer reporter that Newton’s truck had barreled down Church Street, just north of the crash site, at a high speed.

future lawsuit impending

[chknwing]

Well nvm. Idk if chknwing quoted the wrong article or the website changed it. Nothing what he said was in the article.

 

 

lol they altered it already.

[Cary Kollins]

Well nvm. Idk if chknwing quoted the wrong article or the website changed it. Nothing what he said was in the article.

Ok because the observer, or one of their editors, did tweet a BS headline like "Cam Newton has 16 driving citations".

But what the headline didn't say is 15 of those citations were from college. Only one since 2011.

That poo pissed me off.

[KillerKat]

lol they altered it already.

lol that's hilarious. Someone got their ass chewed.