Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Check out our BRUTAL schedule for next year


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

the only thing that hasn't been decided about the games for next year is the dates and times but everything else has already been figured out.

from the carolina panthers website under "future opponents"

http://www.panthers.com/News/Default.aspx?id=1622

Every team within a division plays 16 games as follows:

* Home and away against its three division opponents (6 games).

* The four teams from another division within its conference on a rotating three-year cycle (4 games).

* The four teams from a division in the other conference on a rotating four-year cycle (4 games).

* Two intraconference games based on the prior year’s standings (2 games). These games match a first-place team against the first-place teams in the two same-conference divisions the team is not scheduled to play that season. The second-place, third-place, and fourth-place teams in a conference are matched the same way each year.

2008 Panthers Opponents		2009 Panthers Opponents

Home 		Away 		Home 		Away

Atlanta 	Atlanta 	Atlanta 	Atlanta

New Orleans 	New Orleans 	New Orleans 	New Orleans

Tampa Bay 	Tampa Bay 	Tampa Bay 	Tampa Bay

Chicago 	Green Bay 	Philadelphia 	Dallas

Detroit 	Minnesota 	Washington 	New York Giants

Denver 		Oakland 	Buffalo 	New England

Kansas City 	San Diego 	Miami 		New York Jets

NFC West 	NFC East 	NFC North 	NFC West

The NFL scheduling format includes the following elements:

* There is an increased common-opponent emphasis with every team in a division playing against 14 common opponents.

* All teams play each other on a regular basis, home and away, for a more consistent presentation of attractive games.

* Teams are guaranteed to play all non-division opponents in their conference at least once every three years and at home at least once every six years.

* Every AFC team plays every NFC team once every four years and at home once every eight years.

* A team’s record from the previous year has less of a bearing on its schedule with only two opponents based on the previous year’s standings.

* The division in which a team resides is less of a factor in a team’s won-loss record with 10-of-16 games each year against non-division teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

brutal...but no way to tell until we actually get into the '09 season...what looks tough now might not be so tough

THANK YOU!!

I have this same argument all the time with people.

Before this season, you would have looked at their sched and thought SD & GB would be great teams and Atl would be a candidate to be swept. Now, not so much as SD and GB have losing records and Atl is a surprise playoff contending team in the NFCS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the only thing that hasn't been decided about the games for next year is the dates and times but everything else has already been figured out.

from the carolina panthers website under "future opponents"

http://www.panthers.com/News/Default.aspx?id=1622

The schedule has been set like this since 2002. I don't understand why so many people are clueless about how next year's opponents are selected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The schedule has been set like this since 2002. I don't understand why so many people are clueless about how next year's opponents are selected.
shrug.gif

if they cared enough they could figure out who we were going to be facing for the next couple years, not that it will matter much.

i suspect there could end up being 6 or 7 HC changes this coming offseason not to mention all the major shifts in players that could come about.

it's going to be a good year of football and we will get to see how good our team really is. there shouldn't be any question about their toughness or statements that we haven't beaten anybody really tough if we finish with a good record.

i'm looking forward to it, but not as much as i am the upcoming games

we are here now. let's focus on the present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...