Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With 4 games left


Newtcase

Recommended Posts

That entire stat line was accumulated in now ten games, sure the season is 12 games deep but for purposes of understanding the pace he's on then you have to account for the fact that he didn't record a reception in the first two games and all the production has come in only ten games.  As for your comparison to Brandon Lloyd, it isn't even close.  

 

I have watched all the games on game rewind and formulated an opinion, have you?  Dobson's in his doghouse hey, you have this information direct from Belichick no doubt.  Maybe you could give him a call and find out exactly why Dobson is in the doghouse and why he's so insistent on trotting out subpar talent.  You even fail at trolling.

 

You don't omit games because he didn't have a reception. He was active and playing those two games and didn't have the ability to get any receptions. That's a part of his production. LaFell is doing no better than Lloyd was in this system. You clearly don't know much about football. If you've actually watched the games then you would've made a coherent argument not one that has random, meaningless stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting claim as LaFell is only credited with two drops all season.

http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/drops/2014/

 

Interesting that you say plug Dobson in, when Dobson obviously isn't plugged in even though LaFell has apparently made crucial drops at crucial times.  

 

If 700 yards, 7 TD, and 53 receptions in 9 games isn't beasting, what is?  That rate projects to 1250 yards, 12 TD, and 96 receptions over 16 games....on a team with other options.

 

you are wasting your time. Most here were glad to run him out of town and will not admit he was better than they thought.No one will admit they were wrong.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right, When you take away Brady's stats, wins and Super Bowl rings, and look at isolated bad plays he's pretty much Tim Teebow.

 

 

Why don't you compare Brady's 1st 4 season to Cam's and comeback to me 

 

Comp. was around 62.0 Passer rating around 87.0 .

 

Not to far from Cam's numbers IMO and the Belicheck system made Cassell a 86. rating the season Brady was out...

 

 

Do some research before posting...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't omit games because he didn't have a reception. He was active and playing those two games and didn't have the ability to get any receptions. That's a part of his production. LaFell is doing no better than Lloyd was in this system. You clearly don't know much about football. If you've actually watched the games then you would've made a coherent argument not one that has random, meaningless stats.

 

So by your logic a player can never be hot, improve, or develop chemistry because you must always consider past games that are irrelevant to the evolution of their performance NOW.  You're a moron.  And lord forbid anyone ever correlate meaningful stats like receptions, yards and touchdowns to how a player is performing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you compare Brady's 1st 4 season to Cam's and comeback to me 

 

Comp. was around 62.0 Passer rating around 87.0 .

 

Not to far from Cam's numbers IMO and the Belicheck system made Cassell a 86. rating the season Brady was out...

 

 

Do some research before posting...

just compare the common denominator, LaFell. Whoops, Brady wins and so does LaFell and we lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember when lafell said before the season how much harder the patriots practice was than the panthers practice. Everyone thought it was sour grapes from wee mayne. After watching the pats and packers later today. I say lafell spoke the truth for once. And I couldn't stand him when he was here show up for one game disappeared for 2 or 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...