Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Serious Question about righting this roster


TANTRIC-NINJA

Recommended Posts

As we know there are the extentions of Cam/Kuchley looming over the head of this franchise. IMO with the current cap situation, extensions and having to retool the secondary, OL and WRS how long is it going to take to get this roster playoff bound.

The realites:

Greg Olsen FA and aged

Thomas Davis FA and aged

Kalil not a dominant player and paid at an elite level.

Charles Johnson not the same.guy after that damn leg whip in NE.

Need for a new DE.

Will Star return to his rookie form?

In need of another Lber too esp if TD is not retained.

I see three more seasons until we get back so if that IS the case..do you extend Cam to a big contract or reset this thing? As Gettles prob wanted all along.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I have said all along yet people keep bashing me for it, trade Cam for a buttload of draft picks because it is going to take a lot more players to field a good team than an inconsistent QB. You know how much a team would give up for Cam just for the name alone? A whole lot. Cam is replaceable regardless of what these blind Cam homers say how good he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I have said all along yet people keep bashing me for it, trade Cam for a buttload of draft picks because it is going to take a lot more players to field a good team than an inconsistent QB. You know how much a team would give up for Cam just for the name alone? A whole lot. Cam is replaceable regardless of what these blind Cam homers say how good he is.

Yeah cam is replaceable, the best qb we have had in franchise history is replaceable. Do you know how dumb that sounds?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I have said all along yet people keep bashing me for it, trade Cam for a buttload of draft picks because it is going to take a lot more players to field a good team than an inconsistent QB. You know how much a team would give up for Cam just for the name alone? A whole lot. Cam is replaceable regardless of what these blind Cam homers say how good he is.

 

lets keep bashing him for this comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah cam is replaceable, the best qb we have had in franchise history is replaceable. Do you know how dumb that sounds?

 

Sad that the best QB we have had in franchise history is a mediocre passer. Just shows you how pathetic this franchise has been.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sad that the best QB we have had in franchise history is a mediocre passer. Just shows you how pathetic this franchise has been.

Mediocre passer with less than mediocre, line less than mediocre pass catchers, and less than mediocre play calling. And thats to

Put it nicely. Im sure you were on cams balls last year when he dominated with a halfway competent supporting cast. This team is ass and thats the problem. Not cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mediocre passer with less than mediocre, line less than mediocre pass catchers, and less than mediocre play calling. And thats to

Put it nicely. Im sure you were on cams balls last year when he dominated with a halfway competent supporting cast. This team is ass and thats the problem. Not cam.

 

Nope. I'm not one of you people that switch their opinion about someone every other year. I have said this from the beginning. I have always doubted his consistency and accuracy since he has gotten here and it has not changed. Oh, and BTW, Cam didn't dominate last year. He played very well, but mostly got carried by our once elite defense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...