Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How often will Shula try and stretch the field with Brown?


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

Rivera told us this wasn't about what Avant said.  While most of us are waving the Bullshyt flag it is now time for him to prove what he said.

 

IMO I think we should put Brown on a Go route first offensive play of the game.   Whether he catches it or not.   We need to open the field a bit.  If Minnesota wants to cover him one on one.   I would go after it often. 

 

Shula doesn't seem to be that type of OC that is going to use this weapon too much.   He used Ginn last year but not nearly enough. 

 

When we signed Brown after the draft I felt he was a gem.  He has shown he can play and is only going to get better.

 

I got one thing for SHULA.....  USE HIM!!!!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh Norman told me Brown is the second fastest guy on the team behind Colin Jones.

Is Brown going to start on the outside or are we going to put him in situationally only? Cotch should be manning the slot only and Brown should be starting opposite KB. The question is, are Rivera and Shula smart enough to do that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...