Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jurassic World


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

The Apatosaurus wasn't even CGI. It was an animatronic and looked just as good as the original animatronics. The CGI was also by far the best in the series. How can you be one of those obnoxious people who talk to the screen? You realize that completely ruins the experience for others and you should have been thrown out right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they wanted a summer popcorn flick that was entertaining, I think they pulled it off.   I'm not even one that usually watches these type of movies, other than Marvel movies, I usually watch the independant movies like the ones up for awards every year, but I appreciate movies for what they are, it's called going in with proper expectations.

I recently watched Fast 7 and I went in with the same expectations of previous films like that and I enjoyed it.

Months ago I watched Theory of Everything and Imitation Game, and I went in expecting a good story and great acting, and they both delivered.   Have to have the right expectations.

Mad Max still the highlight of films I've watched in theatre this summer though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they wanted a summer popcorn flick that was entertaining, I think they pulled it off.   I'm not even one that usually watches these type of movies, other than Marvel movies, I usually watch the independant movies like the ones up for awards every year, but I appreciate movies for what they are, it's called going in with proper expectations.

I recently watched Fast 7 and I went in with the same expectations of previous films like that and I enjoyed it.

Months ago I watched Theory of Everything and Imitation Game, and I went in expecting a good story and great acting, and they both delivered.   Have to have the right expectations.

Mad Max still the highlight of films I've watched in theatre this summer though.

Yeah Mad Max was definitely the best theater experience I've had in years.

And don't get me wrong. I was entertained by Jurassic World. I went to a late show and walked out feeling like I'd had a double espresso. But I still recognize what it was; a mediocre film and a money grab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there really was only one direction they could've gone with this, and that's OMG A MORE KILLER DINO. making a sequel to the first kind of pins them to that (and the conversation the characters have about public demand dictating things like quality and judgement is ironically applicable to films like this one.) if you go into it knowing it's going to be a film about a bigger badder dinosaur and everything that has to come with it it's fun and you won't be disappointed.

the action scenes were done well enough and chris pratt was awesome. a little too heavy-handed on the tributes to JP and the kids were incredibly expendable (seriously it's not hard to create kid characters you don't wish would die.) most of the potential plot twists were killed because the writing constantly tipped its hand.

oh and the older brother was most def gay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...