Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jurassic World


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

So, in a theme park where they plan to have a poo ton of tourists, they made a genetically engineered giant, extremely poisonous, camouflaged, intelligent, killing-machine?  And they thought that was a good idea?  As if regular dinosaurs just weren't enough.  I just can't wait to hear their reasoning for that in the movie... that is if they even explain it at all.

 

Oh yeah, and not to mention the first 3 Jurassic Park movies where it's been well-established in that movie world that fuging with dinos isn't a very good idea.  So they respond by making a super dinosaur.  Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting tadbits I just found out from my buddy.

- Apparently the park has security measures (exoskeleton suits). He's not sure they'll survive the cutting room floor but scenes were filmed with them.

- The Raptors you see running aside Pratt's character are indeed 'obedient', and are used like bloodhounds and herding dogs.

- The original script for JP4 involved little to no Dinos at all, just Dr. Malcolm slipping into insanity.

- There's a chance that the D-Rex's jaw can split in half while attacking its prey.

I was right about the raptors. I'm a god damn genius. That would be the only reason they still have them around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you guys on this. If a theme park ever did create living dinosaurs it would absolutely huge. Bigger than disneyland, universal studios, and seaworld. I honestly don't think they would ever have to start tinkering with dinosaur DNA in order to attract more customers. In the book the DNA guy thinks he can "improve" the dinosaurs they've created by making them docile, slower, and overall just less lethal. So it's interesting to see that this version of the character basically wants to make the worlds greatest predator. 

 

 

The brains and athletic ability of a velociraptor

 

The size and brute force of a T-Rex

 

The camouflage and defensive abilities of a cuttlefish

 

The toxicity and hunting abilities of an adder

 

 

That's going to be one hell of a dinosaur to try to take down. I personally think that it's a cool idea and DNA tinkering adds an entire new element to the franchise. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

The premise of this movie is so offensively bad that I honestly can't imagine how it ever got made. The second trailer only confirms my initial suspicions of its absolute suckiness.

 

Why at a park with thousands of children, would you ever think it's a good idea to engineer a super smart alpha predator?

How did they get enough scientists in a room capable of manipulating genetic codes, but not the common sense to say this is a terrible fuggin' idea?

Why, when one of the big problems of the first Jurassic Park was the dinosaurs were hiding and the guests couldn't see them, even if you thought genetic engineering was a good idea, why would you ever want a camouflaging dinosaur? That's like, "Hey, we made cancer contagious and airborne." "Why would you do that?" "Well because 'Corporate' said so, and I didn't get this PhD in Neurophysiology to question orders from a room full of guys who got a business degree from an online university." 

Why would you have army guys with SMGs try to kill the super predator after it escapes rather than just evacuating the island and nuking it from orbit (I bet you $63 (it's what I had in my wallet ($65.20 if you will accept change) that it's because those two stupid teen boys they show in every commercial get lost in that stupid fuggin orb and they have to go rescue them)

Why would a trainer go into a pen with velociraptors when even the most experienced lion tamers feed them through a goddamned hole in a metal wall?

Why the hell wouldn't they assume the mega smart predator would figure out where the tracking device was? "She remembered where they put it in?" SERIOUSLY? She remembered where they put it in? That's the explanation? "Yeah, it couldn't be that she feels the football sized piece of jagged metal that beeps every 15 seconds that we jammed in the nape of her. She must have remembered where we injected it. Because I know that every time I have minor surgery the side of the incision doesn't hurt like a sonofabitch for 5 days afterwards. Yeah no, she must have remembered it with her super brain. She's smart enough to remember that diode we buried under an inch of subcutaneous tissue." She's probably not even that smart, she just thought it was a splinter.

After the mega-predator ate it's mega-predator sibling and you figured out , "who crap, this thing is a killing machine," why wouldn't you put like a self destruct device with a syringe of cyanide hooked up to it's veins, or an exploding microchip up it's nose like in Mission Impossible 3?

 

 

Because it's a stupid, stupid fugging movie idea, that's why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do those two things have to do with each other.

Come on, you two! Don't you wish a Jurassic Park movie was goong to be better than this? Wouldn't you ask for better after all these years than another bad sequel money grab? Maybe not. Maybe it's exactly what you want. I just wish we could expect more from a franchise based ona Michael Crichton novel heavily based on near-future science than a SyFy channel premise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are they going to explain how they managed to recapture all the dinosours. Because according to the first movie the security system failed and they were able to run wild on the island immediately afterword. Its highly unlikely even if you had a army, you could capture them all. Just one full grown t-rex would be a hastle. 2 islands with dinosours running around, yet here we are with them being back in the partk..how?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...