Nate Chandler, DeAngelo Williams to Start

[TheRumGone]

Unlike the RB option....not sure we have someone who would suck less.

At this point I'm more concerned with their unwillingness to shake the line up a bit. It's so bad as it is right now it's worth a shot

[CBDellinger]

Opposing DEs often don't touch him either.

 

 

typically this kind of comment is an exaggeration... in this case it's just fact.

[t96]

Opposing DEs often don't touch him either.

 

 

You're thinking of that guy on the left side. Chandler gets touched with a pinky and he flops back like he just got shot with a 50 caliber bullet.

[Chaos]

I guess the number of days between games isn't enough time to evaluate all that tape, so he just resorts to the same bums.

[thennek]

Well, as unbelievable and scary as this may sound....maybe Chandler is better than Scott.  Which means Scott is really, really bad as opposed to just real bad. 

 

Remember the Panthers cut him so they obviously thought Chandler was better earlier in the year.  Truthfully, it probably does not matter if Chandler or Scott start at RT.  They are both bad.

 

 

[pantherclaw]

Well, as unbelievable and scary as this may sound....maybe Chandler is better than Scott. Which means Scott is really, really bad as opposed to just real bad.

Remember the Panthers cut him so they obviously thought Chandler was better earlier in the year. Truthfully, it probably does not matter if Chandler or Scott start at RT. They are both bad.

but he was drafted!!!

To play offensive line!!

That makes him....

I mean, he's got to better....right?

[t96]

Well, as unbelievable and scary as this may sound....maybe Chandler is better than Scott.  Which means Scott is really, really bad as opposed to just real bad. 

 

Remember the Panthers cut him so they obviously thought Chandler was better earlier in the year.  Truthfully, it probably does not matter if Chandler or Scott start at RT.  They are both bad.

 

It's more about doing something to change things up. Rivera and Shula keep putting the exact same offense on the field and expecting difference results. That's insanity. Our current o-line is not working so whether or not Scott is good doesn't matter, it couldn't be worse. Same with the #2 WR. Philly should play more than Cotch and Avant, but no the veterans are much better.

[Jeremy Igo]

Unfortunately, since Norwell only played because of injury to a starter we can no longer assume the better player is on the field anymore when it comes to the O-Line at least.

[PandaPancake]

Stay the course!

[WOW!!]

Add Roman to list of players who Ron refuses to bench for bad playing...

[Mr. Scot]

You're thinking of that guy on the left side. Chandler gets touched with a pinky and he flops back like he just got shot with a 50 caliber bullet.

 

Actually it was more of a play on words, though guys do blow by Chandler as well.

 

I'll grant that bell is the more frequent 'stand and watch' blocker of the two.

 

[Mr. Scot]

Well, as unbelievable and scary as this may sound....maybe Chandler is better than Scott.  Which means Scott is really, really bad as opposed to just real bad. 

 

Remember the Panthers cut him so they obviously thought Chandler was better earlier in the year.  Truthfully, it probably does not matter if Chandler or Scott start at RT.  They are both bad.

 

It's possible, but I don't have a lot of faith in judgements and evaluations made by this coaching staff.

 

[Sean Payton's Vicodin]

They're trying to tank

No other explanation

[rmoneyg35]

Being that Atlanta is known to be soft this year as last you think you would want a physical runner like Stewart to start.