Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some may not take this seriously, but here's a scenario for you


Matthias

Having the number one pick  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. How would you handle the number one overall pick in 2015 in terms of trades?

    • Trade the pick and build around Cam
      10
    • Trade Cam, draft Mariota, and build around him
      2


Recommended Posts

Let's say we don't win another game this season.  The Raiders and Jags miraculously wins 4 games, and we end up with the number one overall pick.  Would you trade that pick away for as many picks you can get, and build around Cam?  Or would you draft Mariota (I wouldn't consider Winston), trade Cam for as many picks as possible, and build around Mariota?

 

I would probably trade Cam and build around Mariota.  They are both very athletic QBs, but Mariota can maneuver better than Cam.  Furthermore,  Mariota won't have to come in and prove his worth as a passing QB.  Mariota could be an even more athletic version of Andrew Luck.  I understand all the problems with the O-line and the talent that is present around Cam.  Yet this idea that Cam has to prove himself to everybody is getting old real quick.  How many commercials does Cam have showing that chip on his shoulder?  That's a lot of baggage for one guy to carry.  I've seen enough of Cam to say I don't think he's worth the big time contract.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think no matter the scenario, it's certainly possible that Gettlemen could trade Cam, along with firing Rivera.  Neither of these guys were "his" choices.  If Gettlemen is seeing that writing on the wall for him, he may start fresh this offseason, and bring in "his" guys.  So in this scenario of us having the number one overall pick, as unlikely as that is, I'm pretty sure trading Cam is a definite possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, he wouldn't. Manning would have enough sense to get rid of the ball faster.

To who? Guys can't even run a route.

A couple of sacks are on Cam not getting the ball out. The majority tonight were o line miscommunication and defense getting free runs at QB.

Can't throw the ball if no one is open or haven't even made one move to get open yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think no matter the scenario, it's certainly possible that Gettlemen could trade Cam, along with firing Rivera.  Neither of these guys were "his" choices.  If Gettlemen is seeing that writing on the wall for him, he may start fresh this offseason, and bring in "his" guys.  So in this scenario of us having the number one overall pick, as unlikely as that is, I'm pretty sure trading Cam is a definite possibility.

 

You may be the biggest dumbass in the history of the huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody should take this question seriously.

 

But I'll play the game.  Trade down.  In a perfect world get a top LT with our first pick, a top 3 WR with our second (late 1st, if anyone has two 1sts this year..).  Good S in the 2nd, RT in the 3rd, RB/CB in the 4th, CB/RB in the the 5th, G in the 6th and 7th.  Win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This would be the best option a future 2nd and 57 maybe. We’d still have ammo for this draft and you never know what capital we may acquire for next years draft. But getting EZ would really add some juice to our draft a top 3/4 Edge the top WR or at least top 1/2 WR seems like a good haul after two rounds of the draft. This isn’t close to a Brooks dislike last year and dam it sometimes you roll the dice you hit some you crap out some. But not trying or sitting and waiting isn’t going to get us our second impact player and we need 2 to 3 out of this draft to continue to build on where we need to be to contend with all teams.
    • You know when I won't be happy about this pick? When it completely ruins my fantasy draft this year, hahahahaha. We do an auction draft and while I have the most historical success in our league (same group of guys for about 15 years now), my one flaw is that I have a real hard time not overpaying for the guys I have a soft spot for and our league has gotten good at getting me to over bid on them to get them. I'm so screwed this year, I'm going to have to put a very hard cap on my budget for T-Mac and not allow myself to bid a dollar over it.  I've already made the determination that he's going to be the first player I nominate this year so I can get it out of the way early and don't sit on budget waiting for him only to over pay or not get him in the end.
    • Right. You want a quick hitting offense to receivers who can get open. The personnel around Bryce would be much better suited to a power run game and deep play action which would, unironically, be better suited to a guy like Sam Darnold.    Unless we draft another Theilen like guy later on, I truly don’t get it.    I still want Skattebo though. Have a feeling I won’t get that wish either. 
×
×
  • Create New...