Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Need some help understanding the salary cap.


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

Good teams never have any cap room and never go around talking about being in "cap hell"

Players play well and you pay them what they deserve, you don't insult them and try to undervalue their production so you can sign them on the cheap. That's why Gross retired, Captain and Mitchell left, Ginn left, and Lafell. Most we didn't talk to until it was too late because Gettleman is so arrogant he thought nobody would pay for their services. I keep telling you guys that this offseason was not part of some magic Gettleman plan. The poo blew up in his face and we're all witnessing the aftermath. Hey but it's just November right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good teams never have any cap room and never go around talking about being in "cap hell"

Players play well and you pay them what they deserve, you don't insult them and try to undervalue their production so you can sign them on the cheap. That's why Gross retired, Captain and Mitchell left, Ginn left, and Lafell. Most we didn't talk to until it was too late because Gettleman is so arrogant he thought nobody would pay for their services. I keep telling you guys that this offseason was not part of some magic Gettleman plan. The poo blew up in his face and we're all witnessing the aftermath. Hey but it's just November right?

 

You are correct, good teams tend to not be in "cap hell".  We should try being one of those.  So far that seams to be DG's philosophy.

 

Also good teams let go of good players all the time.  Good teams tend to have more good players then bad teams and because of the salary cap they have to let some go.  The key for them is to replace them with cheaper players that are just as good.  They let the bad teams overpay for them.

 

If we would have kept all of the players that people around here wanted us to keep we wouldn't have enough cap space to fill all 53 roster spots.  Or we would have to let other fan favorites go and then people would complain about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct, good teams tend to not be in "cap hell".  We should try being one of those.  So far that seams to be DG's philosophy.

 

Also good teams let go of good players all the time.  Good teams tend to have more good players then bad teams and because of the salary cap they have to let some go.  The key for them is to replace them with cheaper players that are just as good.  They let the bad teams overpay for them.

 

If we would have kept all of the players that people around here wanted us to keep we wouldn't have enough cap space to fill all 53 roster spots.  Or we would have to let other fan favorites go and then people would complain about that.

 

this was illustrated in a graphic during the ravens game last night

 

they have what, 3 starters left over from the super bowl winning defense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...