Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Need some help understanding the salary cap.


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

So I was looking at some of the moves made this off-season trying to see why we were not able to sign a viable LT. Obviously Hardy counts 13mil against the cap. We signed Harper to a 2 year 4.5mil deal. I'm not sure of the structure though.

Reports were the Panther offered Anthony Collins a contract similar to what Tampa offered and he chose Tampa. His salary for this year is 6mil.

A top tier tackle Branden Albert got a big deal from the dolphins with a cap number this year of 2.5mil.

If the cap number next year is supposed to rise and DG was willing to spend money on guys like Harper and Decoud was there really no way he could have signed a decent lineman? I mean why not take the money used on Harper and use it to entice Collins. Or structure a deal like Branden Albert got. Am I missing something?

Yes I know The Panthers will need to sign Cam and Luke but what good is Cam without a decent Oline. We are all witnessing it first hand right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I was looking at some of the moves made this off-season trying to see why we were not able to sign a viable LT. Obviously Hardy counts 13mil against the cap. We signed Harper to a 2 year 4.5mil deal. I'm not sure of the structure though.

Reports were the Panther offered Anthony Collins a contract similar to what Tampa offered and he chose Tampa. His salary for this year is 6mil.

A top tier tackle Branden Albert got a big deal from the dolphins with a cap number this year of 2.5mil.

If the cap number next year is supposed to rise and DG was willing to spend money on guys like Harper and Decoud was there really no way he could have signed a decent lineman? I mean why not take the money used on Harper and use it to entice Collins. Or structure a deal like Branden Albert got. Am I missing something?

Yes I know The Panthers will need to sign Cam and Luke but what good is Cam without a decent Oline. We are all witnessing it first hand right now.

 

What exactly is your question? 

Start here with your questions, its detailed and does a great job at the cap.  It was started way back and undergone a lot of changes.  The guy, I forget his name, but he is a Jets fan and busted his hump to make it.

 

http://overthecap.com/

 

WRT doing the best to answer your questions without specific knowledge of the contracts it depends on how the Panthers are looking to spend their money.

 

But, one thing to consider is the Panthers value of those players.  If Albert got $2.5mm from the Fins and was only offered $2.2mm from the Panthers then you may have to figure the Panthers only valued him at $2.2mm and did not want to spend over that limit.  Spending over that limited value - one derived from algorithms and complex matrices - could tilt or skew the value or contract demands of another player on the team, also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no excuse. They simply thought Bell and Chandler were better than they are. Just like Amini was better than his back up, or KK not starting, Norman being in the doghouse until now and he's beyond better than anything they've fielded, KB being shown he needs to be accountable by sitting and then having his worst performance afterwards. All stupid decisions IMO. The list goes on; as Mr. Scott pointed out- poor judgment is the answer, simple as that, inexcusable.

They also don't realize no one want to be insulted and underpaid except those aging with little options. A little more money wouldn't have skewed anything. It would have shown nothing less than the fact the FO might care about protecting their franchise more than a saving a little extra. Is the alternative any better? Well you tell me, it's currently on he field. The panthers have very, very little to offer a player besides money compared to other teams, something Gettle is going to have to come to understand.

This coaching staff needs to be gone, it's really the only fix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...