Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you want Jim Harbaugh if Panthers continue to suck?


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Jim Harbaugh is out after this year unless he wins Super Bowl.  It looks like it's going to be a long season for the Panthers with report that Rivera is close to losing locker room. 

 

We had a chance to land Harbaugh 4 years ago and we failed.  Looks like it will be another chance.

 

http://www.si.com/nfl/2014/10/05/jim-harbaugh-niners-not-coming-back-coach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would I? Absolutely. Do I think there's a chance it happens? No. It's crossed my mind a few times just so many variable is why I doubt it would happen. We would have to fire Rivera which I don't think will happen. The 49ers have to let him walk which sounds likely. Then we would have to want him here which we appeared to have no interest in last time. A lot of variables make me think it's unlikely but I'd be on board with it. I think he also likes the west coast if I'm not mistaken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Harbaugh is out after this year unless he wins Super Bowl.  It looks like it's going to be a long season for the Panthers with report that Rivera is close to losing locker room. 

 

We had a chance to land Harbaugh 4 years ago and we failed.  Looks like it will be another chance.

What credible reports have there been about Rivera losing the locker room?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...