Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

34 defense: a solution to a problem


Ruff

Recommended Posts

This thread isn't about our struggles against the 34 defense. Actually, it's about our own struggles to get pressure on the quarterback.

Right now, we're suffering because of Greg Hardy being out, among other things. My solution, move our defense to the 34 defense, because i believe we have the pieces to run it effectively.

Say what?!

Think about it. We get 0 pressure from our ends because of the lack of pressure the DTs are getting. However, KK is getting a fair amount of push. Set him and Star up as the DE/DTs of the 34, and let them pass rush from inside. Use Colin Cole as the NT, and let Edwards come in and refresh Star, and let Star move inside to the NT when Cole gets tired.

But what about Johnson? Well, Johnson can spell KK, because I think Short is the better of the two players right now.

Moving on, Kuechly and Klein could both start at the ILB position. Kuechly being the read and react ILB, responsible for the RB (think Willis) and Klein becomes the blitzing ILB. Davis can either pass rush or cover the TE from the OLB position.

But what about the stand up DE?

Wes Horton.

That's right. Horton has the speed to rush freely off the outside, but not the moves or power to rush from a stance. Let him roam out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While you were adding more, I was editing my post...to talk about than more.

Lol.

I think Horton is truly key to the OLB position on this team. He played a similar position as Nick Perry at USC, who is now playing OLB for Green Bay.

The 34 would also give us the ability to need not rely on a nickel so muh, since Davis could cover the slot receiver within a certain zone, as could Kuechly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly it's not like flipping a light switch.

It's more like converting an engine from manual transmission to automatic. It seems like they're similar, but the moving pieces are very different. And if you want to do that anyway, you're better off buying a new car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread isn't about our struggles against the 34 defense. Actually, it's about our own struggles to get pressure on the quarterback.

Right now, we're suffering because of Greg Hardy being out, among other things. My solution, move our defense to the 34 defense, because i believe we have the pieces to run it effectively.

Say what?!

Think about it. We get 0 pressure from our ends because of the lack of pressure the DTs are getting. However, KK is getting a fair amount of push. Set him and Star up as the DE/DTs of the 34, and let them pass rush from inside. Use Colin Cole as the NT, and let Edwards come in and refresh Star, and let Star move inside to the NT when Cole gets tired.

But what about Johnson? Well, Johnson can spell KK, because I think Short is the better of the two players right now.

Moving on, Kuechly and Klein could both start at the ILB position. Kuechly being the read and react ILB, responsible for the RB (think Willis) and Klein becomes the blitzing ILB. Davis can either pass rush or cover the TE from the OLB position.

But what about the stand up DE?

Wes Horton.

That's right. Horton has the speed to rush freely off the outside, but not the moves or power to rush from a stance. Let him roam out there.

 

I've thought about this too, but I think Addison would be a better stand up DE then Horton.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We already run some variations of a 3-4 making it a hybrid, we definitely don't have the secondary to consistently run a 3-4 due to the amount of man coverage that is necessary to successfully run this defense. 

 

I believe you...but perhaps we could get more pressure than we're generating now which may mitigate some of the pass coverage issues.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...