Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anybody use google wallet or similar stuff?


pstall

Recommended Posts

Ok, I use YNAB for my budgeting, I set it up at home, and then there are iPhone and android apps to keep track of what is budgeted, and what is available. It syncs through drop box. To limit her spending, I just opened an account at the local credit union, and deposit what she is allowed to spend. And as you said, anything left over at the end of the budget period, she keeps half for blow money. It has worked well for us, and she is much more cognizant of her spending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I use YNAB for my budgeting, I set it up at home, and then there are iPhone and android apps to keep track of what is budgeted, and what is available. It syncs through drop box. To limit her spending, I just opened an account at the local credit union, and deposit what she is allowed to spend. And as you said, anything left over at the end of the budget period, she keeps half for blow money. It has worked well for us, and she is much more cognizant of her spending.

As one who grew up in the 80's careful with blow money...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why no cash? And are/will you be on the same budget?

Cash can be lost and never seen again. Card can be replaced if need be.

I may use the card just for discretionary stuff.

Im trying to stop the ease in which we spend without micro managing.

I will test this for the month of Nov and see how it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cash can be lost and never seen again. Card can be replaced if need be.

I may use the card just for discretionary stuff.

Im trying to stop the ease in which we spend without micro managing.

I will test this for the month of Nov and see how it goes.

In general, that excuse about cash is a huge cop out - we, and several other families that I've coached, have been on a cash basis for years without issue. Besides, it sounds like you're already losing money by using cards... might as well try something different, right?

From a mechanical standpoint, try having separate accounts where each of you gets $X a pay period to do with as you please. Doesn't matter what each of you does with it, so plenty of autonomy, and once it's gone, it's gone. All other money not earmarked for bills is automatically saved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In general, that excuse about cash is a huge cop out - we, and several other families that I've coached, have been on a cash basis for years without issue. Besides, it sounds like you're already losing money by using cards... might as well try something different, right?

From a mechanical standpoint, try having separate accounts where each of you gets $X a pay period to do with as you please. Doesn't matter what each of you does with it, so plenty of autonomy, and once it's gone, it's gone. All other money not earmarked for bills is automatically saved.

That's an idea.

Not a fan of cash man. Once it's gone it's gone. If it works for you thats great.

I will look into sep accounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's an idea.

Not a fan of cash man. Once it's gone it's gone. If it works for you thats great.

I will look into sep accounts.

 

Not trying to sway your thinking, but I got the wifey on cash only for about 2 months...she was up a few hundred in that time period.

 

However, she slid right back into normalcy....and now she is asking for my card all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...