Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Clinton Portis on WFNZ yesterday....


SCP

Recommended Posts

Because if we have to tag cam it will only delay the inevitable. If you have to tag Cam, he is not your franchise QB any longer and not worth the money it would cost to tag him. He has no future on the team. Franchise QB's make that much money because a team can plan their entire offense around them long term. Paying a QB that much money for just a season or two is a recipe for many, many losing seasons to come when there are such obvious needs elsewhere.

Better to make him the best offer you can make. If he chooses to go elsewhere, thats on him. You take the money you would have paid him and invest in areas of need.

I agree with this.

But I don't think he's going anywhere.

Note: I'm not very smart and am usually wrong (according to my wife)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All reports have been that Richardson and Cam are pretty tight, and Big Cat knows the revenue Cam brings in. I would be shocked if Richardson doesn't personally get involved if push comes to shove.

I don't see Cam leaving, if he does then a lot of people will be on the hotseat.

Plus if we were not confident I don't think we would have moved Smitty and turned team over to Cam.

At the end of the day, I think there will be posturing on both sides, and eventually deal will get done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All reports have been that Richardson and Cam are pretty tight, and Big Cat knows the revenue Cam brings in. I would be shocked if Richardson doesn't personally get involved if push comes to shove.

I don't see Cam leaving, if he does then a lot of people will be on the hotseat.

Plus if we were not confident I don't think we would have moved Smitty and turned team over to Cam.

At the end of the day, I think there will be posturing on both sides, and eventually deal will get done

 

Could very well be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will be another Mike Mitchell situation I fear. We'll fail to lock Cam up to along term deal, then Dallas will offer him 200 gazillion for 4 yrs and we won't be able to keep him in Carolina.

We can still franchise him after this year though, so we will at least have him for another year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will be another Mike Mitchell situation I fear. We'll fail to lock Cam up to along term deal, then Dallas will offer him 200 gazillion for 4 yrs and we won't be able to keep him in Carolina.

We can still franchise him after this year though, so we will at least have him for another year

Mitchell is not a good example.  He was a stop gap that played well enough with the opportunity to get a big contract.  Only person that the situation could compare to is Peppers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because if we have to tag cam it will only delay the inevitable. If you have to tag Cam, he is not your franchise QB any longer and not worth the money it would cost to tag him. He has no future on the team. Franchise QB's make that much money because a team can plan their entire offense around them long term. Paying a QB that much money for just a season or two is a recipe for many, many losing seasons to come when there are such obvious needs elsewhere.

 

Better to make him the best offer you can make. If he chooses to go elsewhere, thats on him. You take the money you would have paid him and invest in areas of need.

 

Can't risk letting a franchise player walk for nothing, though.

 

If you're not gonna keep him, give him the non-exclusive tag, let him find the best deal he can and negotiate compensation.

 

Just letting him walk for nothing would be crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't risk letting a franchise player walk for nothing, though.

 

If you're not gonna keep him, give him the non-exclusive tag, let him find the best deal he can and negotiate compensation.

 

Just letting him walk for nothing would be crazy.

 

Sure, that makes sense. I am saying tagging him with the expectation of playing him a year is pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...