Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Flex season


Boltergeist

Recommended Posts

poster on another board:

"I doubt NBC will do any flexing on Weeks 11-16 with those games

protected, but it's not like they have a bad lineup of games:

Week 11: New England at Indianapolis

Week 12: Dallas at New York Giants

Week 13: Denver at Kansas City

Week 14: New England at San Diego

Week 15: Dallas at Philadelphia

Week 16: Seattle at Arizona"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

poster on another board:

"I doubt NBC will do any flexing on Weeks 11-16 with those games

protected, but it's not like they have a bad lineup of games:

Week 11: New England at Indianapolis

Week 12: Dallas at New York Giants

Week 13: Denver at Kansas City

Week 14: New England at San Diego

Week 15: Dallas at Philadelphia

Week 16: Seattle at Arizona"

 

no flexes aside from the cross networks this season (Cleveland-Cincy on FOX this weekend)

 

as for Week 17, there could be 3 winner takes the division games (DET-GB, CIN-PIT, CAR-ATL). If both SD and KC are each 9-6, that matchup may have a Wild Card spot on the line. If CIN/PIT lose the next 2 weeks then CLE-BAL would be in play as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's still 4 games in play for SNF 

 

GB-DET - DET can clinch this week if they win and GB loses otherwise they're playing for the division next Sunday

CAR-ATL - Both teams have to win this week to play for the South next weekend

CIN-PIT - If both teams stay ahead of BAL, then they're playing for the North

SD-KC - If both teams win, then they would be playing for a WC spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...