Game-plan vs. Green Bay: Kaepitalize?

[firefox1234]

In my opinion last game was on Godfrey. I kno this is a team sport but when the other team gets 6 or 7 straight 3rd down conversions targeting you then a person have to start looking at themselves closely. If Panthers made even one stop the offense yesterday would have very much capitalized. I really hope Bene or Norman can play vs GB or we could be looking at another shootout.

[@bobbyagnese]

Is everyone forgetting that the Packers play 3-4? Our offensive line is going to get fuged.

[mbarbour21]

I just changed it myself, this is what it was suppose to say before my phone was jerk:

Okay, so first of all, forgive me ahead of time for using Kaep in a positive light on the huddle....WHAT WAS I THINKING??? Well, for one, the Cincy game was a tie, lets move on. Please!!! Secondly, Kaep has "historically" (if you can call it that) beaten Green Bay. A huge factor has been his designed runs/scrambles, or at least GB having to respect it. Kaep totaled 181 rushing yards alone in their last meeting.

So I believe getting Cam some designed runs early will put GB on there toes, and at the very least, open up some passing lanes. (Kaep had over 400 yards against GB week 1 last year) I say break out those game films!!!

Cam seems to get healthier every week. If he can improve on yesterday's performance, against a lesser defense, he could really go off. Get him started early instead of waiting until the third quarter to unleash him!!! Cam is a better passer than Kaep, so the game-plan should work even better for us.

Do you guys believe this is the best plan of attack???

[mbarbour21]

Is everyone forgetting that the Packers play 3-4? Our offensive line is going to get fuged.

No, thats why I was hoping we would use the read option. Will give us a better chance i believe. No sacks yesterday by the way.

[TheRumGone]

actually yes.

 

Cams gonna need to run for 2 reasons.

 

1. 3-4 defense our oline has been atrocious

 

and

 

2. GB defense cannot stop mobile qbs. They get absolutely destroyed.

[firefox1234]

Last time i checked GB were last in run D and 6th in pass D.

[Chaos]

It's gonna be a tie.

 

Next season we should just shoot for 0-0-16.  Good luck with that shitstorm Gordell.

[IGSaint]

OR. The Panther's defense can go out and perform like we built them to be. Front 7 needs to get pressure on Rodgers and limit GB running game, while Luke and Davis limits their TE from catching intermediate passes.

 

Seattle did a good job, the Dolphins (at least until the last drive) did a fairly good job as well against their offense.

 

GB can get into shootouts because their FO decided to give Rodgers an o-line, and invest some cap space into their TEs and WRs, and they drafted a RB.

 

The Panthers, for the most part, took the opposite approach, therefore THAT unit needs to step up and shut down Rodgers and lead us to victory.

 

I don't disagree with anything you said. But after these 4 games, this defense is withering down my expectations for them. And it's ridiculous because it's the defense we were focusing on all off season because of the lack of focus on building an elite offensive line for Cam.

[mbarbour21]

Next season we should just shoot for 0-0-16. Good luck with that shitstorm Gordell.

Well if a tie is .5 wins/.5 losses.....wouldnt that make us 8-8??? Lol! Haha!........ah crap......still talkn bout this stupid tie!.....oh well, what the heck!!!

[cookinbrak]

They needed help beating Miami. In Green Bay, Happy hour has come and gone.

[UKPanther94]

They needed help beating Miami. In Green Bay, Happy hour has come and gone.

 

They tripped up beating the Jets as well, if the Jet's coaches werent stupid enough to call a timeout it's a tie game and anythings possible, it's not an impossible game by any stretch of the imagination

[CharlottePanther]

This will be Lions game 2011 all over again, final score will be like 48-45 or some mess, I never was into fantasy football, I even realize starting Rodgers against our D is probably the most sure thing you will come across.

[imminent rogaine]

Rogers has shown that he will run the ball himself if there is an opening. We have shown that we have no problem letting a traditional quarterback run the ball 15 yards at a time.

[London Loves Luke]

Okay, so first of all, forgive me ahead of time for using Kaep in a positive light on the huddle....WHAT WAS I THINKING??? Well, for one, the Cincy game was a tie, lets move on. Please!!! Secondly, Kaep has "historically" (if you can call it that) beaten Green Bay. A huge factor has been his designed runs/scrambles, or at least GB having to respect it. Kaep totaled 181 rushing yards alone in their last meeting.

So I believe getting Cam some designed runs early will put GB on there toes, and at the very least, open up some passing lanes. (Kaep had over 400 yards against GB week 1 last year) I say break out those game films!!!

Cam seems to get healthier every week. If he can improve on yesterday's performance, against a lesser defense, he could really go off. Get him started early instead of waiting until the third quarter to unleash him!!! Cam is a better passer than Kaep, so the game-plan should work even better for us.

Do you guys believe this is the best plan of attack???

 

Pie and quote for an actually decent piece of analysis before the Huddle Tie experts took over.