Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it time Bersin replaces Avant?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Not a overreaction or home town bias. Just judging from the play of the two,I think Bersin's play deserves more timing time. All he has done is produce when called apon. Judging from the two's natural ability I don't think avant offer's much more than Bersin and Avant has shown suspect hand's at times. Yes he caught a TD early in the season but had atleast two ugly drops today. I say let the young blood in there and see what he does with more chances to make plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Avant made a hell of a sideline grab today that was negated since there was a defensive holding penalty drawn by Cotchery on Burfict. Avant also had a nice pick up a screen play and had a nice block on the Cam TD.

Bersin is a good role type player but not an every down WR just yet. Avant is a much better blocker and he's stronger and doesn't get knocked off his route as easy.

Hopefully this offseason we can find someone with a little speed. We went deep to Philly once today and it resulted in a huge gain due to a penalty.

But like said above, your issue should be with Cotchery today and not Avant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...