Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All of this outrage over a tie. This is what you should be outraged over.


Datawire

Recommended Posts

Not sure what you are getting at.

One player (a franchise QB) who had ankle surgery, and one (leading receiver) who has had a gimpy angle since last weekend. Both targeted by the same opposing player in the same manner. You don't see a pattern there?

But what Spikes did is not uncommon on the football field. Perhaps that is why The Golden Calf of Bristol said, "I don't think that we did anything in that game that they didn't do." Perhaps that is why Ealey said that Spikes should not have been suspended.

What Spikes did might have been inexcusable, but it certainly is not the first time a player has attempted to deliberately injure someone in the heat of a game.

That is the nature of the dogpile in football. Players fight for leverage, they fight for the football. Cameras rarely catch the nastiness of the mass of humanity in a pile, so players tell the horror stories for themselves.

UCF receiver A.J. Guyton had his calf deliberately stomped.

Former Gators defensive lineman Clint McMillan nearly had his eyes gouged in a game against Eastern Michigan in 2004.

UCF defensive end Bruce Miller sheepishly admits he has thrown a few punches himself.

Walter Payton was known for pinching when he got caught in the middle of a pile. Titans center Kevin Mawae once told a story about a high school teammate using a shoelace to choke somebody in a pile. Then there are the stories of, ahem, unmentionables being squeezed.

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2009-11-07/sports/0911060197_1_pile-brandon-spikes-dirty-player

It's actually commonplace in football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is sports. Hurting anyone intentionally is just criminal. The NFL would not ban him for hurting someone intentionally but they sure would ban him if he beat up his girlfriend a couple times.

Who has ever went to jail for intentionally hurting someone in the NFL? And why does he have to beat his girlfriend?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. I hadn't seen that. That is really bad. He could easily have ended two NFL careers today. Looks like he let up on Cam and Olsen rolled out of it, but that needs to be addressed by league by immediately.

 

For all the fuss over the rules against good clean football hits these days, I always thought there was understanding between players not to take out a guy's legs like that. That's not cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...