Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam v. Luck - The "Build Around" Philosophy


Ruff

Recommended Posts

Weapons are not just draft picks but free agents which have made up a big portion of our offensive weapons. Talking about weapons without including all of them make the whole discussion rather inadequate, don't you agree. Why not include them and then make the comparison?

Just a suggestion and no I don't care enough to look it up myself.......

Valid point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weapons are not just draft picks but free agents which have made up a big portion of our offensive weapons. Talking about weapons without including all of them make the whole discussion rather inadequate, don't you agree. Why not include them and then make the comparison?

Just a suggestion and no I don't care enough to look it up myself.......

 

I was actually going to, but the Colts free agent history page is a god awful mess. I can do it when I have enough time.

 

Example: here's the Colts' page: http://www.colts.com/team/transactions.html

 

Here's the Panthers' page: http://www.panthers.com/team/history/free-agency-history.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was actually going to, but the Colts free agent history page is a god awful mess. I can do it when I have enough time.

Example: here's the Colts' page: http://www.colts.com/team/transactions.html

Here's the Panthers' page: http://www.panthers.com/team/history/free-agency-history.html

Overlay the list when you get it assembled and then based on current or past contribution give them a simple grade like 0 for a rookie on IR to a 3 for a starter and perhaps 2 for a rotational guy and a 1 for a guy who is a project. Anyway you get a composite score that has a quantity factor as well as a quality aspect to better make your point or negate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overlay the list when you get it assembled and then based on current or past contribution give them a simple grade like 0 for a rookie on IR to a 3 for a starter and perhaps 2 for a rotational guy and a 1 for a guy who is a project. Anyway you get a composite score that has a quantity factor as well as a quality aspect to better make your point or negate it.

That was the plan. Looking at the Colts list, it was hard to determine how to say if s player was a net gain, loss, or push when he was signed and then released like a month later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weapons are not just draft picks but free agents which have made up a big portion of our offensive weapons. Talking about weapons without including all of them make the whole discussion rather inadequate, don't you agree. Why not include them and then make the comparison?

Just a suggestion and no I don't care enough to look it up myself.......

Weapons? Plural?

Greg Olsen is one man. Not plural. He was also picked up before Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was the plan. Looking at the Colts list, it was hard to determine how to say if s player was a net gain, loss, or push when he was signed and then released like a month later.

Well that one is easy, if you sign him and don't use him he is a 0 in my system. It isn't net loss or gain but relative value. Everything goes from no value to great value. it rewards the pick up and development of a guy .
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you're #1 Gettleman Fanboi, but I'm actually not saying it's his fault. I'm saying it's partly fault for everyone involved. The coaching staff, the front office (both of the regimes), the owner, etc. Cam needs to have more weapons. It's as simple as that.

Lol Why be rude? i didnt say anything about you and what you said. Just Putting in my 2cents. I aint his fanboy, i simply wont bash him for the decisions he has made. They were very tough decisions and its way immature to react so hard against him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weapons? Plural?

Greg Olsen is one man. Not plural. He was also picked up before Cam.

Weapons include vets and guys already here picked up by anyone. After all who you already have on the roster greatly influence who you pick up on both sides of the ball. I thought you were going to chime in with how much of a weapon that DeAngelo is to Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such a pathetic excuse.

Since when a QB depends on his Defense to help him score? Yes, the defense is important but how does that help Cam in the offensive realm?

 

Field position.

 

That was semi-sarcastic.  Defense won't help them move the ball better, but field position makes it so you don't need to move the ball as far.

 

Also not having to play catch up keeps the offense from being forced into 1 dimension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...