Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade for Morgan Moses?


ctrcat

Recommended Posts

Again, in regard to the future, having a good player buried on the depth chart isn't necessarily a bad thing. In hindsight, if Gaffney hadn't gotten injured, he might be starting right now.

I wouldn't have minded on taking a flyer on a late round OT, though. I agree with you there, if for no other reason, to let Bell and Chandler know that they could be replaced any day.

your bottom statement is pretty much what i was getting at everything else I agree with to this point
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

I'm not making excuses for the front office, I would have loved to seen a tackle took somewhere in the draft.  I'm just trying to point out some of the issues with drafting a tackle, especially for a team that has a lot of holes to fill.  Just because we draft one that doesn't mean the line will improve.

 

I know alot of people around here (especially now with hindsight) wish we would have took Hurst instead of Gaffney but I don't think that was as clear cut as some would have you to believe.  The fact is once you get into the later rounds the chance of landing a starter are actually really low.  People around here love to name the few that do make it but they often leave out the majority that don't.

 

 

 

There are starters drafted in every round and even starters in UDFA. 

 

Yes it aint easy to always find them, but that is what the scouting offices and GM's are getting paid to do. 

 

Hurst over Gaffney was a no brainer assuming Hurst checks out medically. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are starters drafted in every round and even starters in UDFA.

Yes it aint easy to always find them, but that is what the scouting offices and GM's are getting paid to do.

Hurst over Gaffney was a no brainer assuming Hurst checks out medically.

I wanted us to draft Hurst also but to call 11% a no brainer is a bit of a reach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weeks ago rumors were that the Skins were trying to get something for him, and if not, releasing him. May have just been rumors, but wouldn't doubt it. His name was actually THE most prominent name in mock drafts for our FIRST round pick. OMG. Moron Marc James formerly of WFNZ lambasted GMan all over Carolina airwaves after the draft for not taking this guy. Scary.

 

That's why the media geeks,as well us fans need to leave the draft process to the GM,scouts and coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted us to draft Hurst also but to call 11% a no brainer is a bit of a reach.

 

It is only 11% drafting blind. If you are a superior talent evaluator than chances are higher than that. 

 

At the end of the day, the bottom line is there are starters to be had in every round. No one cares about excuses. 

 

My comment for the FO would be to step their scouting and evaluating game up and find those diamonds in the rough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is only 11% drafting blind. If you are a superior talent evaluator than chances are higher than that.

At the end of the day, the bottom line is there are starters to be had in every round. No one cares about excuses.

My comment for the FO would be to step their scouting and evaluating game up and find those diamonds in the rough.

So the league must be blind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...